Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWSvsFCTEETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, FCTE's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.89% for FCTE. CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. FCTE performs better with 3.93% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and FCTE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWS vs FCTE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS FCTE | -1.04%-4.35% | -5.59%+2.33% | -3.15%+3.93% | +3.33%+3.13% | +39.86%n/a | +53.01%n/a |
| Flows | CWS FCTE | -$6M+$3M | -$14M-$8M | -$10M+$2M | -$17M-$200M | +$93M- | +$106M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS FCTE | +14.57%+16.87% | +16.27%+20.26% | +14.04%n/a | +15.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS FCTE | -7.73%-6.30% | -10.33%-13.39% | -16.20%n/a | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS FCTE | 51d43d | 29d45d | 404dn/a | 532dn/a |
CWS | FCTE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.54 | $25.41 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.56 | $25.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CWS | FCTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.54 | $25.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $163.61 M | $221.91 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.89% |
CWS | FCTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | 3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 20 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWS and FCTE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while FCTE has returned 3.93%. That puts FCTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or FCTE?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$2M for FCTE.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or FCTE?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 16.27%, while FCTE experienced 20.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or FCTE?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS holds $163.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while FCTE manages $221.91 M.
What sectors do the CWS and FCTE ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FCTE focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and FCTE ETF?
CWS top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS. FCTE holds in its top three: TRACTOR SUPPLY, LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC and CARDINAL HEALTH.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or FCTE?
CWS holds 24 securities with 63.99% of its assets in the top 15. FCTE has 20 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.51%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
