CWSvsEUSAETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, EUSA's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.09% for EUSA. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. EUSA performs better with 12.63% YTD performance, and +$264M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and EUSA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs EUSA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS EUSA | +1.52%+3.50% | -4.72%+0.86% | -0.69%+12.63% | +1.55%+14.83% | +35.65%+69.48% | +39.61%+40.00% |
| Flows | CWS EUSA | -$8M-$51M | -$12M+$53M | -$65M+$264M | -$68M+$316M | +$9M+$921M | +$49M+$1.01B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS EUSA | +12.52%+10.54% | +13.51%+11.92% | +13.82%+14.19% | +15.85%+17.03% |
| Max drawdown | CWS EUSA | -9.63%-6.59% | -11.94%-7.82% | -16.20%-18.22% | -23.63%-25.29% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS EUSA | 77d78d | 196d49d | 404d226d | 532d834d |
Trading data
CWS | EUSA | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $116.12 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $115.77 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | EUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | EUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $116.12 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +0.30% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $1.88 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
CWS | EUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 511 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | May 5, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
EUSA
USA
94.53%
Other
5.47%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
EUSA
Finance
20.74%
Technology
18.36%
Industrials
14.13%
Healthcare
11.37%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.16%
Other
28.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
EUSA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.05%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
EUSA
Okta, Inc.
0.31%
Strategy, Inc.
0.31%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.28%
Illumina, Inc.
0.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.28%
Twilio, Inc.
0.27%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.27%
Intel Corp.
0.27%
Natera, Inc.
0.26%
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.26%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.26%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.25%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.25%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.24%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and EUSA
How have the CWS and EUSA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while EUSA has returned 12.63%. That puts EUSA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or EUSA?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$264M for EUSA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or EUSA?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while EUSA experienced 11.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or EUSA?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while EUSA manages $1.88 B.
What sectors do the CWS and EUSA ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, EUSA focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and EUSA ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. EUSA holds in its top three: Okta, Inc., Strategy, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or EUSA?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. EUSA has 515 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.05%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
