Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWSvsBIBLETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Inspire 100 ESG ETF (BIBL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, BIBL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.41% for BIBL. CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. BIBL performs better with 7.07% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and BIBL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWS vs BIBL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS BIBL | -1.04%-4.24% | -5.59%+4.41% | -3.15%+7.07% | +3.33%+28.13% | +39.86%+66.51% | +53.01%+55.21% |
| Flows | CWS BIBL | -$6M+$2M | -$14M+$5M | -$10M+$5M | -$17M+$15M | +$93M-$45M | +$106M+$118M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS BIBL | +14.57%+17.58% | +16.27%+20.10% | +14.04%+16.99% | +15.72%+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | CWS BIBL | -7.73%-4.94% | -10.33%-14.51% | -16.20%-20.33% | -23.63%-30.90% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS BIBL | 51d28d | 29d45d | 404d233d | 532d812d |
CWS | BIBL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.54 | $47.37 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.56 | $47.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CWS | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CWS | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.54 | $47.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $163.61 M | $391.23 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.41% |
CWS | BIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Inspire 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | October 31, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWS and BIBL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while BIBL has returned 7.07%. That puts BIBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or BIBL?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$5M for BIBL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or BIBL?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 16.27%, while BIBL experienced 20.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or BIBL?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS holds $163.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while BIBL manages $391.23 M.
What sectors do the CWS and BIBL ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BIBL focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Real Estate.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and BIBL ETF?
CWS top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS. BIBL holds in its top three: CATERPILLAR, KLA CORPORATION and ARISTA NETWORKS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or BIBL?
CWS holds 24 securities with 63.99% of its assets in the top 15. BIBL has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.88%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
