Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWSvsBCUSETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, BCUS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.8% for BCUS. CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. BCUS performs better with 1.52% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and BCUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWS vs BCUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS BCUS | -1.04%-2.79% | -5.59%+1.06% | -3.15%+1.52% | +3.33%+13.52% | +39.86%n/a | +53.01%n/a |
| Flows | CWS BCUS | -$6M-$4M | -$14M-$4M | -$10M-$4M | -$17M-$26M | +$93M- | +$106M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS BCUS | +14.57%+13.47% | +16.27%+16.11% | +14.04%n/a | +15.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS BCUS | -7.73%-3.75% | -10.33%-10.89% | -16.20%n/a | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS BCUS | 51d13d | 29d37d | 404dn/a | 532dn/a |
CWS | BCUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.54 | $31.99 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.56 | $32.10 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CWS | BCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.54 | $31.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $163.61 M | $93.55 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.8% |
CWS | BCUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 29 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | December 21, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWS and BCUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while BCUS has returned 1.52%. That puts BCUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or BCUS?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to -$4M for BCUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or BCUS?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 16.27%, while BCUS experienced 16.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or BCUS?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS holds $163.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCUS manages $93.55 M.
What sectors do the CWS and BCUS ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BCUS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and BCUS ETF?
CWS top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS. BCUS holds in its top three: PHILLIP MORRIS, CURTISS WRIGHT and TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or BCUS?
CWS holds 24 securities with 63.99% of its assets in the top 15. BCUS has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.3%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
