CWIvsPTINETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. CWI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.67% for PTIN. CWI is up 7.72% year-to-date (YTD) with +$105M in YTD flows. PTIN performs better with 8.64% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and PTIN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWI vs PTIN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWI PTIN | +8.87%+8.77% | +1.24%+2.26% | +7.72%+8.64% | +32.53%+29.32% | +61.64%+37.78% | +49.28%+33.21% |
| Flows | CWI PTIN | +$98M- | +$75M+$12M | +$105M+$5M | +$363M-$3M | +$342M+$16M | +$404M+$19M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWI PTIN | +19.61%+19.74% | +12.78%+13.01% | +13.01%+12.80% | +14.00%+11.85% |
| Max drawdown | CWI PTIN | -10.82%-11.16% | -10.82%-11.16% | -13.36%-13.61% | -29.10%-17.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWI PTIN | 58d58d | 58d58d | 43d177d | 1056d848d |
Trading data
CWI | PTIN | |
Last sale 4/29/2026 at 7:06 PM | $38.43 | $33.98 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $38.72 | $34.29 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWI | PTIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/29/2026 at 7:06 PM
Live
Closed
CWI | PTIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.43 | $33.98 |
| 1D performance | -0.76% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $2.64 B | $181.18 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.67% |
Characteristics
CWI | PTIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | Pacer Trendpilot International Index |
| N° of holdings | 994 | 452 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2007 | May 2, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWI
Japan
14.15%
Canada
9.23%
United Kingdom
9.19%
USA
8.68%
Other
58.74%
PTIN
Japan
21.71%
United Kingdom
11.74%
Canada
10.49%
Republic of Korea
7.37%
Other
48.69%
Sectors
CWI
Financials
22.35%
Industrials
13.32%
Information Techn.
8.74%
Consumer Discreti.
8.14%
Other
47.46%
PTIN
Financials
23.51%
Industrials
16.38%
Information Techn.
13.11%
Consumer Discreti.
7.9%
Other
39.1%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.34%
PTIN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.77%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
CWI
US8740391003
4.13%
US7960508882
1.73%
ASML HOLDING
1.57%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.13%
SHELL PLC
0.95%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.93%
NOVARTIS
0.89%
ASTRAZENECA
0.89%
SK HYNIX
0.86%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.83%
NESTLE SA
0.80%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.75%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.64%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.62%
TOYOTA
0.60%
PTIN
SAMSUNG ELECTR
2.76%
ASML HOLDING
2.37%
SK HYNIX
1.50%
ASTRAZENECA
1.44%
NOVARTIS
1.35%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.31%
SHELL PLC
1.27%
NESTLE SA
1.19%
TOYOTA
1.13%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.06%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.93%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.92%
TOTALENERGIES SE
0.89%
BHP GROUP LTD
0.83%
SIEMENS
0.82%
Frequently asked questions about CWI and PTIN
How have the CWI and PTIN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 28, 2026, CWI is up 7.72% year-to-date (YTD), while PTIN has returned 8.64%. That puts PTIN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or PTIN?
Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$105M in flows, compared to +$5M for PTIN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or PTIN?
Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 12.78%, while PTIN experienced 13.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWI or PTIN?
As of April 28, 2026, CWI holds $2.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while PTIN manages $181.18 M.
What sectors do the CWI and PTIN ETFs invest in?
CWI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, PTIN focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and PTIN ETF?
CWI top holdings include US8740391003, US7960508882 and ASML HOLDING. PTIN holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, ASML HOLDING and SK HYNIX.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or PTIN?
CWI holds 1086 securities with 17.34% of its assets in the top 15. PTIN has 480 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.77%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
