CWIvsLCTDETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. CWI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.37% for LCTD. CWI is up 15.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$105M in YTD flows. LCTD performs worse with 6.81% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and LCTD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWI vs LCTD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWI LCTD | +5.45%+1.50% | +11.65%+4.10% | +15.55%+6.81% | +32.75%+20.55% | +70.80%+50.87% | +56.52%+40.71% |
| Flows | CWI LCTD | -+$22M | +$98M+$22M | +$105M+$22M | +$363M-$6M | +$342M-$297M | +$379M-$347M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWI LCTD | +18.40%+19.89% | +13.59%+15.12% | +13.22%+14.69% | +14.11%+16.05% |
| Max drawdown | CWI LCTD | -4.40%-4.90% | -10.82%-11.20% | -13.36%-13.33% | -28.77%-29.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWI LCTD | 21d21d | 65d108d | 43d217d | 925d925d |
Trading data
CWI | LCTD | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:48 PM | $41.10 | $57.91 |
| Previous close 06/17/2026 | $40.60 | $57.58 |
| Consolidated volume 06/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWI | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:48 PM
Live
Closed
CWI | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.10 | $57.91 |
| 1D performance | +1.23% | +0.57% |
| AuM | $2.80 B | $258.81 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.37% |
Characteristics
CWI | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1011 | 329 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2007 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWI
Japan
14.13%
USA
9.4%
Canada
9.09%
United Kingdom
9.03%
Other
58.35%
LCTD
Japan
19.66%
Canada
13.21%
United Kingdom
11.7%
France
8.67%
Germany
8.1%
Switzerland
7.38%
Other
31.28%
Sectors
CWI
Financials
22.26%
Industrials
13.57%
Information Techn.
10.43%
Consumer Discreti.
7.99%
Other
45.75%
LCTD
Financials
25.53%
Industrials
18.04%
Information Techn.
8.8%
Health Care
7.94%
Consumer Discreti.
7.38%
Other
32.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.51%
LCTD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CWI
US8740391003
4.55%
US7960508882
2.09%
ASML HOLDING
1.61%
SK HYNIX
1.35%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.00%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.97%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.85%
CH1499059983
0.84%
SHELL PLC
0.84%
NOVARTIS
0.81%
ASTRAZENECA
0.80%
NESTLE SA
0.76%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.73%
SIEMENS
0.66%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.64%
LCTD
ASML HOLDING
2.21%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.69%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.67%
ASTRAZENECA
1.60%
ENI
1.34%
NOVARTIS
1.25%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
1.24%
HITACHI
1.22%
SIEMENS
1.18%
IBERDROLA SA
1.17%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.13%
NESTLE SA
1.10%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
1.06%
SIEMENS ENERGY AG
1.00%
ENGIE
0.98%
Frequently asked questions about CWI and LCTD
How have the CWI and LCTD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 17, 2026, CWI is up 15.55% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTD has returned 6.81%. That puts CWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or LCTD?
Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$105M in flows, compared to +$22M for LCTD.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or LCTD?
Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 13.59%, while LCTD experienced 15.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWI or LCTD?
As of June 17, 2026, CWI holds $2.80 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTD manages $258.81 M.
What sectors do the CWI and LCTD ETFs invest in?
CWI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, LCTD focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and LCTD ETF?
CWI top holdings include US8740391003, US7960508882 and ASML HOLDING. LCTD holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and ROYAL BK CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or LCTD?
CWI holds 1107 securities with 18.51% of its assets in the top 15. LCTD has 350 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
