Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWIvsLCTDETF Comparison
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. CWI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.37% for LCTD. CWI is up 2.8% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. LCTD performs worse with 1.61% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and LCTD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWI vs LCTD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWI LCTD | -5.79%-5.22% | +4.11%+2.98% | +2.80%+1.61% | +28.29%+23.68% | +62.84%+55.01% | +47.04%n/a |
| Flows | CWI LCTD | -- | +$71M- | +$7M- | +$295M-$27M | +$244M-$319M | +$371M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWI LCTD | +14.22%+15.14% | +14.30%+15.99% | +12.49%+14.04% | +13.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWI LCTD | -7.79%-7.53% | -13.36%-12.79% | -13.36%-13.33% | -29.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWI LCTD | 11d11d | 43d37d | 43d217d | 1056dn/a |
CWI | LCTD | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.80 | $55.62 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $37.54 | $56.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CWI | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CWI | LCTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.80 | $55.62 |
| 1D performance | -1.97% | -1.61% |
| AuM | $2.42 B | $229.41 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.37% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWI and LCTD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CWI is up 2.8% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTD has returned 1.61%. That puts CWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or LCTD?
Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to - for LCTD.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or LCTD?
Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 14.3%, while LCTD experienced 15.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWI or LCTD?
As of March 12, 2026, CWI holds $2.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTD manages $229.41 M.
What sectors do the CWI and LCTD ETFs invest in?
CWI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, LCTD focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and LCTD ETF?
CWI top holdings include US8740391003, ASML HOLDING and US7960508882. LCTD holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and ASTRAZENECA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or LCTD?
CWI holds 1100 securities with 17.51% of its assets in the top 15. LCTD has 331 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.16%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
