CWIvsIDEQETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. CWI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.4% for IDEQ. CWI is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$170M in YTD flows. IDEQ performs better with 18.81% YTD performance, and +$1.17B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and IDEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWI vs IDEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWI IDEQ | +0.23%+0.90% | +4.73%+5.35% | +16.02%+18.81% | +23.49%+29.15% | +75.14%n/a | +57.56%n/a |
| Flows | CWI IDEQ | +$25M+$167M | +$65M+$381M | +$170M+$1.17B | +$333M+$1.21B | +$360M- | +$384M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWI IDEQ | +13.73%+14.92% | +14.23%+15.72% | +13.29%n/a | +14.19%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWI IDEQ | -5.02%-6.06% | -10.82%-12.20% | -13.36%n/a | -28.24%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWI IDEQ | 50d56d | 65d89d | 43dn/a | 783dn/a |
Trading data
CWI | IDEQ | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.27 | |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $40.90 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
IDEQ
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWI | IDEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWI | IDEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.27 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.90% | – |
| AuM | $2.87 B | $1.84 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
CWI | IDEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Lazard Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1065 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2007 | May 9, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWI
Japan
14.2%
Canada
8.66%
United Kingdom
8.65%
Taiwan
8.03%
Other
60.46%
IDEQ
Japan
13.67%
United Kingdom
10.22%
Taiwan
8.63%
Canada
8.31%
France
7.22%
Republic of Korea
7.04%
Other
44.91%
Sectors
CWI
Finance
26.24%
Technology
21.67%
Industrials
11.62%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.21%
Other
33.25%
IDEQ
Finance
26.54%
Technology
22.76%
Industrials
14.2%
Healthcare
7.66%
Other
28.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.48%
IDEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.83%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.27%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.81%
ASML Holding NV
1.79%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.06%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.91%
Roche Holding AG
0.87%
Novartis AG
0.79%
Shell Plc
0.71%
Siemens AG
0.70%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.70%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.70%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.66%
IDEQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.99%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.03%
ASML Holding NV
2.88%
BNP Paribas SA
2.16%
VINCI SA
2.00%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.99%
Roche Holding AG
1.94%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.92%
GSK Plc
1.77%
Banco Santander SA
1.72%
NatWest Group Plc
1.57%
Barrick Mining Corp.
1.43%
Legal & General Group Plc
1.43%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
1.35%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
1.26%
Frequently asked questions about CWI and IDEQ
How have the CWI and IDEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CWI is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD), while IDEQ has returned 18.81%. That puts IDEQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or IDEQ?
Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$170M in flows, compared to +$1.17B for IDEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or IDEQ?
Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 14.23%, while IDEQ experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWI or IDEQ?
As of September 11, 2026, CWI holds $2.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while IDEQ manages $1.84 B.
What sectors do the CWI and IDEQ ETFs invest in?
CWI leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, IDEQ focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and IDEQ ETF?
CWI top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. IDEQ holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or IDEQ?
CWI holds 1071 securities with 19.48% of its assets in the top 15. IDEQ has 246 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
