New

Turn ETF ideas into real portfolios. Try the builder now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

CWIvsGXUSETF Comparison

ETF 1
CWI

State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
+0.67%
VS
ETF 2
GXUS

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF

This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
+0.67%

State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. CWI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.18% for GXUS. CWI is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$170M in YTD flows. GXUS performs worse with 15.93% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and GXUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

CWI vs GXUS performance and flow charts

Performance

0.00.51.01.52.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Cumulative Flows

05,000,00010,000,00015,000,00020,000,00025,000,000Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
CWI
GXUS
+0.23%+0.25%
+4.73%+4.92%
+16.02%+15.93%
+23.49%+23.09%
+75.14%+71.88%
+57.56%n/a
Flows
CWI
GXUS
+$25M-
+$65M+$2M
+$170M+$2M
+$333M+$2M
+$360M+$4M
+$384M-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
CWI
GXUS
+13.73%+13.72%
+14.23%+14.58%
+13.29%+13.38%
+14.19%n/a
Max drawdown
CWI
GXUS
-5.02%-4.94%
-10.82%-10.76%
-13.36%-13.39%
-28.24%n/a
Max drawdown duration
CWI
GXUS
50d46d
65d61d
43d214d
783dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
CWI
GXUS
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
$41.27
$64.62
Previous close
09/10/2026
$40.90
$63.98
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
CWI
GXUS
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWI
GXUS
Last price
$41.27
$64.62
1D performance
+0.90%
+1.01%
AuM$2.87 B$642.83 M
E/R0.3%0.18%
Characteristics
CWI
GXUS
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderState Street Investment ManagementGoldman Sachs
BenchmarkMSCI ACWI ex USA IndexSolactive GBS Global ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index
N° of holdings10652306
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateJanuary 10, 2007June 7, 2023
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

CWI
Japan
14.2%
Canada
8.66%
United Kingdom
8.65%
Taiwan
8.03%
Other
60.46%
GXUS
Japan
15.08%
Taiwan
8.65%
Canada
8.01%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Other
60.38%

Sectors

CWI
Finance
26.24%
Technology
21.67%
Industrials
11.62%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.21%
Other
33.25%
GXUS
Finance
25.96%
Technology
21.42%
Industrials
12.26%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.06%
Other
26.14%
Advertisement

Diversification

CWI

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

19.48%
GXUS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

18.38%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
CWI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.83%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.27%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.81%
ASML Holding NV
1.79%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.06%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.98%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.91%
Roche Holding AG
0.87%
Novartis AG
0.79%
Shell Plc
0.71%
Siemens AG
0.70%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.70%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.70%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.66%
GXUS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.60%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.13%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.84%
ASML Holding NV
1.63%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.93%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.92%
Roche Holding AG
0.81%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.77%
Novartis AG
0.77%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.70%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.68%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.67%
Nestlé SA
0.67%
Shell Plc
0.66%
Siemens AG
0.60%
Frequently asked questions about CWI and GXUS

How have the CWI and GXUS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 11, 2026, CWI is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD), while GXUS has returned 15.93%. That puts CWI better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or GXUS?

Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$170M in flows, compared to +$2M for GXUS.

Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or GXUS?

Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 14.23%, while GXUS experienced 14.58%.

Which ETF is bigger: CWI or GXUS?

As of September 11, 2026, CWI holds $2.87 B in assets under management (AUM), while GXUS manages $642.83 M.

What sectors do the CWI and GXUS ETFs invest in?

CWI leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, GXUS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and GXUS ETF?

CWI top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. GXUS holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or GXUS?

CWI holds 1071 securities with 19.48% of its assets in the top 15. GXUS has 2393 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.38%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up