Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWIvsDBAWETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. CWI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, DBAW's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. CWI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. CWI is up 4.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 4.92% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWI and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWI vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWI DBAW | -4.59%-2.32% | +5.51%+6.58% | +4.23%+4.92% | +30.79%+26.82% | +65.11%+66.77% | +48.61%+71.22% |
| Flows | CWI DBAW | -- | +$71M+$6M | +$7M- | +$295M+$34M | +$244M+$31M | +$371M+$67M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWI DBAW | +13.90%+11.71% | +14.23%+12.32% | +12.47%+10.41% | +13.65%+10.85% |
| Max drawdown | CWI DBAW | -7.79%-6.77% | -13.36%-13.17% | -13.36%-13.33% | -29.10%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWI DBAW | 10d9d | 43d55d | 43d84d | 1056d576d |
CWI | DBAW | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.54 | $43.36 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $37.53 | $43.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CWI | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CWI | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.54 | $43.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | +0.32% |
| AuM | $2.45 B | $232.67 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.4% |
CWI | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1006 | 1704 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 10, 2007 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWI and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWI is up 4.23% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 4.92%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWI or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the CWI ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to - for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWI or DBAW?
Over the past year, CWI had a volatility of 14.23%, while DBAW experienced 12.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWI or DBAW?
As of March 11, 2026, CWI holds $2.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $232.67 M.
What sectors do the CWI and DBAW ETFs invest in?
CWI leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWI ETF and DBAW ETF?
CWI top holdings include US8740391003, ASML HOLDING and US7960508882. DBAW holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWI or DBAW?
CWI holds 1100 securities with 17.51% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 1846 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
