Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

CVRDvsFNDBETF Comparison

ETF 1
CVRD

Madison Covered Call ETF

This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+1.05%
VS
ETF 2
FNDB

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF

This fund is part of
US All Cap
+1.72%

Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. CVRD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. CVRD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.92%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. CVRD is up 4.28% year-to-date (YTD) with -$5M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 20.04% YTD performance, and +$201M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CVRD and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

CVRD vs FNDB performance and flow charts

Performance

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 M40 MJul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
CVRD
FNDB
+3.63%+3.16%
+1.01%+8.81%
+4.28%+20.04%
+8.07%+33.50%
n/a+73.07%
n/a+92.49%
Flows
CVRD
FNDB
-$3M+$39M
-$3M+$105M
-$5M+$201M
-$13M+$214M
-+$445M
-+$578M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
CVRD
FNDB
+9.08%+9.85%
+9.63%+10.81%
n/a+13.55%
n/a+15.46%
Max drawdown
CVRD
FNDB
-5.38%-2.16%
-5.63%-6.34%
n/a-16.85%
n/a-19.24%
Max drawdown duration
CVRD
FNDB
64d7d
80d63d
n/a213d
n/a546d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
CVRD
FNDB
Last sale
8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
$18.39
$31.53
Previous close
08/04/2026
$18.28
$31.65
Consolidated volume
08/04/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

CVRD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
CVRD
FNDB
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CVRD
FNDB
Last price
$18.39
$31.53
1D performance
+0.59%
-0.39%
AuM$31.10 M$1.46 B
E/R0.92%0.25%
Characteristics
CVRD
FNDB
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderMadison InvestmentsSchwab ETFs
Benchmark-RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index
N° of holdings341408
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateAugust 22, 2023August 15, 2013
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

CVRD
USA
90.96%
Other
9.04%
FNDB
USA
97.63%
Other
2.37%

Sectors

CVRD
Technology
25.98%
Finance
14.42%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.22%
Healthcare
12.56%
Other
32.82%
FNDB
Technology
23.83%
Finance
17.49%
Healthcare
11.57%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Energy
8.8%
Industrials
7.9%
Other
19.66%
Advertisement

Diversification

CVRD

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

53.32%
FNDB

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

26.11%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
CVRD
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
4.53%
Danaher Corp.
4.38%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.25%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.01%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.90%
Microsoft Corp.
3.82%
Visa, Inc.
3.55%
Broadcom Inc.
3.40%
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.16%
American Tower Corp.
3.16%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.08%
T-Mobile US, Inc.
3.06%
US4385162056
3.02%
Transocean Ltd.
3.01%
BlackRock, Inc.
2.99%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.29%
Intel Corp.
2.16%
Microsoft Corp.
2.11%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
2.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.59%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.58%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Chevron Corp.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.04%
Walmart, Inc.
1.04%
Johnson & Johnson
0.99%
Frequently asked questions about CVRD and FNDB

How have the CVRD and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?

As of August 4, 2026, CVRD is up 4.28% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 20.04%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CVRD or FNDB?

Year-to-date, the CVRD ETF saw -$5M in flows, compared to +$201M for FNDB.

Which ETF is more volatile: CVRD or FNDB?

Over the past year, CVRD had a volatility of 9.63%, while FNDB experienced 10.81%.

Which ETF is bigger: CVRD or FNDB?

As of August 4, 2026, CVRD holds $31.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.46 B.

What sectors do the CVRD and FNDB ETFs invest in?

CVRD leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the CVRD ETF and FNDB ETF?

CVRD top holdings include Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., Danaher Corp. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Intel Corp. and Microsoft Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: CVRD or FNDB?

CVRD holds 34 securities with 53.32% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1412 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.11%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up