Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CVMCvsONEVETF Comparison
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) belongs to the US Mid Cap segment. SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. CVMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, ONEV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. CVMC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.2% for ONEV. CVMC is up 2.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. ONEV performs better with 2.66% YTD performance, and -$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CVMC and ONEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CVMC vs ONEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CVMC ONEV | -3.82%-3.89% | +0.99%+1.38% | +2.25%+2.66% | +16.39%+11.05% | +43.67%+42.65% | n/a+53.39% |
| Flows | CVMC ONEV | --$1M | -$55K-$53M | -$3M-$29M | +$12M-$86M | +$47M-$196M | --$162M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CVMC ONEV | +13.51%+10.59% | +18.73%+14.94% | +16.04%+12.93% | n/a+14.76% |
| Max drawdown | CVMC ONEV | -4.90%-4.49% | -13.93%-10.87% | -21.43%-14.90% | n/a-18.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | CVMC ONEV | 12d9d | 46d42d | 269d254d | n/a566d |
CVMC | ONEV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.91 | $135.29 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $65.17 | $136.62 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CVMC | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CVMC | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.91 | $135.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.93% | -0.98% |
| AuM | $85.18 M | $541.28 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.2% |
CVMC | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Morgan Stanley | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index | Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 574 | 415 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CVMC and ONEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CVMC is up 2.25% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEV has returned 2.66%. That puts ONEV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CVMC or ONEV?
Year-to-date, the CVMC ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to -$29M for ONEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CVMC or ONEV?
Over the past year, CVMC had a volatility of 18.73%, while ONEV experienced 14.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: CVMC or ONEV?
As of March 10, 2026, CVMC holds $85.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEV manages $541.28 M.
What sectors do the CVMC and ONEV ETFs invest in?
CVMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, ONEV focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CVMC ETF and ONEV ETF?
CVMC top holdings include SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, WESTERN DIGITAL and CORNING. ONEV holds in its top three: CARDINAL HEALTH, AMERISOURCEBERGEN and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTN.
Which ETF is more diversified: CVMC or ONEV?
CVMC holds 587 securities with 9.54% of its assets in the top 15. ONEV has 439 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.17%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
