CTAGvsPCSGETF Comparison
Calamos Timpani Active SMID Growth ETF (CTAG) and Polen 5Perspectives Small-Mid Growth ETF (PCSG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CTAG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, PCSG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. CTAG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.75% for PCSG. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CTAG and PCSG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CTAG vs PCSG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CTAG PCSG | -16.12%-16.61% | n/a-15.86% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CTAG PCSG | +$1M+$205K | -+$669K | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CTAG PCSG | n/a+32.35% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CTAG PCSG | n/a-21.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CTAG PCSG | n/a81d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CTAG | PCSG | |
Last sale 11/6/2026 at 2:30 PM | $19.34 | |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $18.77 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CTAG | PCSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $19.34 |
| 1D performance | – | +3.04% |
| AuM | $38.69 M | $2.86 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.75% |
CTAG | PCSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Calamos Investments | Polen Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 82 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 18, 2026 | May 15, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
