Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSNRvsGNRETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. CSNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.4% for GNR. CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. GNR performs worse with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$288M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSNR and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSNR vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSNR GNR | -0.52%-0.35% | +19.80%+18.77% | +18.97%+16.68% | +56.79%+43.08% | n/a+45.26% | n/a+67.99% |
| Flows | CSNR GNR | +$21M+$46M | +$27M+$365M | +$26M+$288M | +$51M+$826M | -+$102M | -+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSNR GNR | +20.68%+19.19% | +18.07%+17.00% | n/a+15.75% | n/a+18.20% |
| Max drawdown | CSNR GNR | -5.16%-4.57% | -14.28%-14.74% | n/a-19.80% | n/a-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSNR GNR | 9d11d | 46d82d | n/a457d | n/a758d |
CSNR | GNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.24 | $72.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.84 | $73.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSNR | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSNR | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.24 | $72.43 |
| 1D performance | -1.63% | -1.66% |
| AuM | $86.08 M | $4.76 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.4% |
CSNR | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | SPDR |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 77 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2025 | September 13, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSNR and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR is up 18.97% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 16.68%. That puts CSNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSNR or GNR?
Year-to-date, the CSNR ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$288M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSNR or GNR?
Over the past year, CSNR had a volatility of 18.07%, while GNR experienced 17%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSNR or GNR?
As of March 11, 2026, CSNR holds $86.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.76 B.
What sectors do the CSNR and GNR ETFs invest in?
CSNR leans toward sectors like Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CSNR ETF and GNR ETF?
CSNR top holdings include EXXON, CH1300646267 and SHELL PLC. GNR holds in its top three: NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSNR or GNR?
CSNR holds 55 securities with 51.51% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Cohen & Steers Enters the ETF World with Triple Launch
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.