CSMDvsRFGETF Comparison
VS
Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. CSMD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.68%, versus 0.35% for RFG. CSMD is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. RFG performs better with 22.23% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSMD and RFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSMD vs RFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSMD RFG | +10.13%+6.20% | +13.35%+15.65% | +13.27%+22.23% | +17.06%+34.54% | n/a+72.11% | n/a+51.99% |
| Flows | CSMD RFG | +$7M-$7K | +$6M+$5M | +$17M+$7M | +$107M-$17M | --$39M | --$124M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSMD RFG | +24.85%+24.04% | +19.87%+19.09% | n/a+20.21% | n/a+22.84% |
| Max drawdown | CSMD RFG | -6.77%-6.18% | -14.80%-10.42% | n/a-26.58% | n/a-35.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSMD RFG | 13d13d | 130d45d | n/a380d | n/a836d |
Trading data
CSMD | RFG | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.81 | $64.10 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $35.01 | $63.40 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSMD | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CSMD | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.81 | $64.10 |
| 1D performance | +2.30% | +1.10% |
| AuM | $478.77 M | $360.09 M |
| E/R | 0.68% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
CSMD | RFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Congress Asset Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 92 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 22, 2023 | March 1, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSMD
USA
89.05%
Other
10.95%
RFG
USA
89.01%
Other
10.99%
Sectors
CSMD
Industrials
23.5%
Information Techn.
21.68%
Health Care
19.08%
Consumer Discreti.
9.25%
Other
26.49%
RFG
Industrials
25.66%
Information Techn.
20.09%
Health Care
19.66%
Consumer Discreti.
8.48%
Materials
7.45%
Other
18.66%
Advertisement
Diversification
CSMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.72%
RFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CSMD
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
4.64%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
4.48%
RAMBUS
4.32%
CURTISS WRIGHT
4.29%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA
4.23%
VALMONT INDUSTRS
3.67%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.95%
ENTEGRIS
2.76%
PENUMBRA
2.76%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.73%
US7811541090
2.53%
NOVANTA INC
2.40%
TRANSMEDICS GROUP
2.32%
HAWKINS
2.32%
BOOT BARN HOLDINGS
2.32%
RFG
TECHNIPFMC PLC
2.40%
ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC
2.30%
RAMBUS
2.24%
MICHAEL STORES
2.22%
VALARIS LTD
2.19%
INTERDIGITAL
2.17%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
2.07%
FABRINET
2.06%
WOODWARD
1.96%
VICOR
1.96%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
1.95%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
1.86%
FIVE BELOW
1.86%
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS
1.72%
DIGITALOCEAN HOLDINGS
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about CSMD and RFG
How have the CSMD and RFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, CSMD is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD), while RFG has returned 22.23%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSMD or RFG?
Year-to-date, the CSMD ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to +$7M for RFG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSMD or RFG?
Over the past year, CSMD had a volatility of 19.87%, while RFG experienced 19.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSMD or RFG?
As of June 18, 2026, CSMD holds $478.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while RFG manages $360.09 M.
What sectors do the CSMD and RFG ETFs invest in?
CSMD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, RFG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the CSMD ETF and RFG ETF?
CSMD top holdings include NVENT ELECTRIC PLC, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and RAMBUS. RFG holds in its top three: TECHNIPFMC PLC, ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSMD or RFG?
CSMD holds 45 securities with 48.72% of its assets in the top 15. RFG has 95 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.66%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
