CSMvsLQDHETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF (CSM) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CSM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.44% for LQDH. CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. LQDH performs worse with 3.44% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSM and LQDH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSM vs LQDH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSM LQDH | +0.63%+0.06% | +1.12%+1.26% | +10.14%+3.44% | +15.89%+5.09% | +80.68%+23.19% | +77.08%+29.42% |
| Flows | CSM LQDH | -+$28M | -$4M+$97M | -$15M+$27M | -$21M+$88M | -$113M+$346M | -$206M+$6M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSM LQDH | +11.19%+1.91% | +12.55%+2.55% | +15.32%+3.30% | +17.27%+4.31% |
| Max drawdown | CSM LQDH | -3.81%-0.60% | -9.26%-2.26% | -18.18%-4.48% | -23.88%-6.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSM LQDH | 61d24d | 98d82d | 124d104d | 713d437d |
Trading data
CSM | LQDH | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:52 PM | $86.92 | $92.44 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $87.78 | $92.36 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSM | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:52 PM
Live
Closed
CSM | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.92 | $92.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $516.33 M | $600.46 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.44% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSM
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CSM
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CSM
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CSM
Data will be available soon
LQDH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CSM and LQDH
How have the CSM and LQDH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD), while LQDH has returned 3.44%. That puts CSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSM or LQDH?
Year-to-date, the CSM ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$27M for LQDH.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSM or LQDH?
Over the past year, CSM had a volatility of 12.55%, while LQDH experienced 2.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSM or LQDH?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM holds $516.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQDH manages $600.46 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
