CSMvsFTLSETF Comparison
VS
ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF (CSM) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 1.38% for FTLS. CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. FTLS performs worse with 8.76% YTD performance, and +$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSM and FTLS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CSM vs FTLS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSM FTLS | +0.63%+1.28% | +1.12%+3.15% | +10.14%+8.76% | +15.89%+12.89% | +80.68%+48.69% | +77.08%+63.72% |
| Flows | CSM FTLS | -+$77M | -$4M+$107M | -$15M+$289M | -$21M+$398M | -$113M+$1.32B | -$206M+$1.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSM FTLS | +11.19%+5.90% | +12.55%+7.15% | +15.32%+8.67% | +17.27%+9.38% |
| Max drawdown | CSM FTLS | -3.81%-1.48% | -9.26%-3.80% | -18.18%-11.43% | -23.88%-11.43% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSM FTLS | 61d3d | 98d65d | 124d214d | 713d214d |
Trading data
CSM | FTLS | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:52 PM | $86.92 | $77.24 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $87.78 | $76.86 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTLS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCSM | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:52 PM
Live
Closed
CSM | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.92 | $77.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | +0.49% |
| AuM | $516.33 M | $2.63 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 1.38% |
Characteristics
CSM | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | ProShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Credit Suisse 130/30 Large Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 13, 2009 | September 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CSM
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CSM
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CSM
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CSM
Data will be available soon
FTLS
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CSM and FTLS
How have the CSM and FTLS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM is up 10.14% year-to-date (YTD), while FTLS has returned 8.76%. That puts CSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSM or FTLS?
Year-to-date, the CSM ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$289M for FTLS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CSM or FTLS?
Over the past year, CSM had a volatility of 12.55%, while FTLS experienced 7.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: CSM or FTLS?
As of October 16, 2026, CSM holds $516.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTLS manages $2.63 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
