Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSIOvsPAVEETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. CSIO's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, PAVE's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Utilities. CSIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.47% for PAVE. CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. PAVE performs worse with 4.99% YTD performance, and +$1.05B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSIO and PAVE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSIO vs PAVE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSIO PAVE | +0.33%-9.00% | +10.26%+3.04% | +10.79%+4.99% | n/a+35.74% | n/a+85.99% | n/a+109.45% |
| Flows | CSIO PAVE | +$4M+$434M | +$12M+$1.26B | +$4M+$1.05B | -+$1.29B | -+$3.60B | -+$5.44B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSIO PAVE | +8.97%+20.37% | n/a+22.70% | n/a+20.37% | n/a+21.81% |
| Max drawdown | CSIO PAVE | -3.76%-9.86% | n/a-14.24% | n/a-26.27% | n/a-26.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSIO PAVE | 10d19d | n/a37d | n/a239d | n/a239d |
CSIO | PAVE | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.17 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $50.50 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSIO | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSIO | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $50.17 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.65% |
| AuM | $24.26 M | $11.45 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.47% |
CSIO | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 91 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2025 | March 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSIO and PAVE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD), while PAVE has returned 4.99%. That puts CSIO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSIO or PAVE?
Year-to-date, the CSIO ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$1.05B for PAVE.
Which ETF is bigger: CSIO or PAVE?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO holds $24.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAVE manages $11.45 B.
What sectors do the CSIO and PAVE ETFs invest in?
CSIO leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, PAVE focuses on Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CSIO ETF and PAVE ETF?
CSIO top holdings include CSX, NEXTERA ENERGY and TC ENERGY CORP. PAVE holds in its top three: HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, PARKER HANNIFIN and QUANTA SERVICES.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSIO or PAVE?
CSIO holds 23 securities with 69.36% of its assets in the top 15. PAVE has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.12%.
Notable ETF Filings Recap: March 2024
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
