Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSIOvsMLPXETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. CSIO's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, MLPX's top sector exposures are Energy, CSIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.45% for MLPX. CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. MLPX performs better with 19.99% YTD performance, and +$55M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSIO and MLPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSIO vs MLPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSIO MLPX | +0.33%+5.64% | +10.26%+20.64% | +10.79%+19.99% | n/a+23.37% | n/a+112.44% | n/a+186.15% |
| Flows | CSIO MLPX | +$4M+$17M | +$12M+$76M | +$4M+$55M | --$27M | -+$1.15B | -+$1.20B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSIO MLPX | +8.97%+15.09% | n/a+19.01% | n/a+16.90% | n/a+20.04% |
| Max drawdown | CSIO MLPX | -3.76%-3.15% | n/a-14.85% | n/a-16.47% | n/a-19.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSIO MLPX | 10d9d | n/a294d | n/a370d | n/a427d |
CSIO | MLPX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.15 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $71.75 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSIO | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSIO | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $72.15 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.56% |
| AuM | $24.26 M | $3.16 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.45% |
CSIO | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2025 | August 6, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSIO and MLPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPX has returned 19.99%. That puts MLPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSIO or MLPX?
Year-to-date, the CSIO ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$55M for MLPX.
Which ETF is bigger: CSIO or MLPX?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO holds $24.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPX manages $3.16 B.
What sectors do the CSIO and MLPX ETFs invest in?
CSIO leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, MLPX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CSIO ETF and MLPX ETF?
CSIO top holdings include CSX, NEXTERA ENERGY and TC ENERGY CORP. MLPX holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSIO or MLPX?
CSIO holds 23 securities with 69.36% of its assets in the top 15. MLPX has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
