Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CSIOvsIFRAETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. CSIO's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, IFRA's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. CSIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.85%, versus 0.3% for IFRA. CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. IFRA performs worse with 9.37% YTD performance, and +$217M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CSIO and IFRA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CSIO vs IFRA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSIO IFRA | +0.33%-3.31% | +10.26%+8.35% | +10.79%+9.37% | n/a+30.72% | n/a+67.59% | n/a+82.11% |
| Flows | CSIO IFRA | +$4M+$98M | +$12M+$240M | +$4M+$217M | -+$794M | -+$774M | -+$2.27B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CSIO IFRA | +8.97%+14.06% | n/a+17.06% | n/a+16.40% | n/a+17.84% |
| Max drawdown | CSIO IFRA | -3.76%-4.96% | n/a-11.33% | n/a-19.89% | n/a-19.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | CSIO IFRA | 10d10d | n/a38d | n/a238d | n/a238d |
CSIO | IFRA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.52 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $57.58 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CSIO | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CSIO | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $57.52 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.10% |
| AuM | $24.26 M | $3.71 B |
| E/R | 0.85% | 0.3% |
CSIO | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Cohen & Steers | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 146 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2025 | April 3, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CSIO and IFRA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO is up 10.79% year-to-date (YTD), while IFRA has returned 9.37%. That puts CSIO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CSIO or IFRA?
Year-to-date, the CSIO ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$217M for IFRA.
Which ETF is bigger: CSIO or IFRA?
As of March 11, 2026, CSIO holds $24.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while IFRA manages $3.71 B.
What sectors do the CSIO and IFRA ETFs invest in?
CSIO leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, IFRA focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CSIO ETF and IFRA ETF?
CSIO top holdings include CSX, NEXTERA ENERGY and TC ENERGY CORP. IFRA holds in its top three: HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, TASEKO MINES and CENTURY ALUMINUM.
Which ETF is more diversified: CSIO or IFRA?
CSIO holds 23 securities with 69.36% of its assets in the top 15. IFRA has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.1%.
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
