CRDTvsHIPSETF Comparison
VS
Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF (CRDT) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. CRDT's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Sovereign and Healthcare. In contrast, HIPS's top sector exposures are Finance, Non-Corporate and Energy. CRDT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.99%, versus 1.17% for HIPS. CRDT is up 2.61% year-to-date (YTD) with -$27M in YTD flows. HIPS performs better with 8.07% YTD performance, and +$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CRDT and HIPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CRDT vs HIPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/07/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CRDT HIPS | -2.35%+1.09% | +0.71%+5.34% | +2.61%+8.07% | +2.23%+7.02% | +10.49%+32.96% | n/a+26.18% |
| Flows | CRDT HIPS | -$4M+$8M | -$5M+$15M | -$27M+$17M | -$54M+$14M | -$23M+$75M | -+$85M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CRDT HIPS | +10.20%+7.27% | +8.75%+9.34% | +6.48%+11.45% | n/a+12.72% |
| Max drawdown | CRDT HIPS | -4.11%-1.91% | -7.13%-5.97% | -9.28%-15.07% | n/a-20.84% |
| Max drawdown duration | CRDT HIPS | 25d12d | 100d105d | 522d317d | n/a843d |
Trading data
CRDT | HIPS | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.95 | $11.74 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $23.00 | $11.76 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CRDT
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCRDT | HIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CRDT | HIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.95 | $11.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.17% |
| AuM | $31.13 M | $126.10 M |
| E/R | 0.99% | 1.17% |
Characteristics
CRDT | HIPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Simplify | GraniteShares |
| Benchmark | - | EQM High Income Pass-Through Securities Index |
| N° of holdings | 21 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 27, 2023 | January 6, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CRDT
USA
72.96%
Other
27.04%
HIPS
USA
99.35%
Other
0.65%
Sectors
CRDT
Finance
54.09%
Sovereign
9.27%
Other
36.63%
HIPS
Finance
54.11%
Non-Corporate
23.95%
Energy
18.09%
Other
3.85%
Diversification
CRDT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.49%
HIPS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CRDT
Rithm Capital Corp.
11.24%
USA, Bills 0% 25aug2026, USD (119D)
6.47%
Dynex Capital, Inc.
4.80%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
4.57%
MFA Financial, Inc.
4.32%
Blue Owl Capital, Inc.
3.86%
US73072DAC56
3.78%
AGNC Investment Corp.
3.47%
Chimera Investment Corp.
3.34%
Chimera Investment Corp.
3.13%
US63942LAC63
3.06%
Full House Resorts, Inc.
2.95%
NO0013712125
2.88%
US26251RAE18
2.83%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, 0% 15jan2032, USD (Conv.)
2.81%
HIPS
Delek Logistics Partners LP
3.40%
Plains All American Pipeline LP
3.27%
CVR Partners LP
3.20%
Dorchester Minerals LP
3.19%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP
3.01%
Western Midstream Partners LP
3.00%
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
2.92%
Alliance Resource Partners LP
2.84%
Black Stone Minerals LP
2.82%
Enterprise Products Partners LP
2.81%
MPLX LP
2.78%
Capital Southwest Corp
2.72%
Blackrock Enhanced Large Cap Core Fund, Inc.
2.65%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.51%
AGNC Investment Corp.
2.51%
Frequently asked questions about CRDT and HIPS
How have the CRDT and HIPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 7, 2026, CRDT is up 2.61% year-to-date (YTD), while HIPS has returned 8.07%. That puts HIPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CRDT or HIPS?
Year-to-date, the CRDT ETF saw -$27M in flows, compared to +$17M for HIPS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CRDT or HIPS?
Over the past year, CRDT had a volatility of 8.75%, while HIPS experienced 9.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: CRDT or HIPS?
As of September 7, 2026, CRDT holds $31.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while HIPS manages $126.10 M.
What sectors do the CRDT and HIPS ETFs invest in?
CRDT leans toward sectors like Finance and Sovereign. Meanwhile, HIPS focuses on Finance, Non-Corporate and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CRDT ETF and HIPS ETF?
CRDT top holdings include Rithm Capital Corp., USA, Bills 0% 25aug2026, USD (119D) and Dynex Capital, Inc.. HIPS holds in its top three: Delek Logistics Partners LP, Plains All American Pipeline LP and CVR Partners LP.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRDT or HIPS?
CRDT holds 35 securities with 63.49% of its assets in the top 15. HIPS has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.64%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CRDT & HIPS
Advertisement
