CRBNvsNZACETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. CRBN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. CRBN is up 11.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$87M in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with 9.17% YTD performance, and -$457K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CRBN and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CRBN vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CRBN NZAC | -0.38%-0.12% | +2.95%+2.89% | +11.99%+9.17% | +12.13%+8.51% | +86.90%+79.44% | +63.07%+53.59% |
| Flows | CRBN NZAC | +$26M- | +$26M- | +$87M-$457K | +$87M-$457K | -$161M-$129M | -$316M+$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CRBN NZAC | +11.81%+10.73% | +14.05%+12.28% | +14.35%+12.57% | +16.06%+14.29% |
| Max drawdown | CRBN NZAC | -3.64%-3.37% | -10.24%-9.86% | -16.48%-15.87% | -26.92%-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | CRBN NZAC | 76d76d | 50d76d | 87d86d | 752d763d |
Trading data
CRBN | NZAC | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $255.98 | $46.38 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $256.65 | $46.55 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $255.98 | $46.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.37% |
| AuM | $1.19 B | $195.24 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 1033 | 593 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2014 | November 25, 2014 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CRBN
USA
62.22%
Other
37.78%
NZAC
USA
63.26%
Other
36.74%
Sectors
CRBN
Technology
36.81%
Finance
21.85%
Healthcare
8.2%
Industrials
8.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.91%
Other
17.1%
NZAC
Technology
40.62%
Finance
23.74%
Healthcare
9.05%
Industrials
8.5%
Other
18.09%
Advertisement
Diversification
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.05%
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CRBN
NVIDIA Corp.
4.91%
Apple, Inc.
4.53%
Microsoft Corp.
3.47%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.45%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.03%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.83%
Broadcom Inc.
1.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.21%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.07%
Tesla, Inc.
1.05%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.96%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.89%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.86%
Johnson & Johnson
0.78%
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.22%
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Broadcom Inc.
1.79%
Tesla, Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.33%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.14%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.14%
Equinix, Inc.
0.98%
Frequently asked questions about CRBN and NZAC
How have the CRBN and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, CRBN is up 11.99% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has returned 9.17%. That puts CRBN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CRBN or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the CRBN ETF saw +$87M in flows, compared to -$457K for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CRBN or NZAC?
Over the past year, CRBN had a volatility of 14.05%, while NZAC experienced 12.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: CRBN or NZAC?
As of October 28, 2026, CRBN holds $1.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $195.24 M.
What sectors do the CRBN and NZAC ETFs invest in?
CRBN leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CRBN ETF and NZAC ETF?
CRBN top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CRBN or NZAC?
CRBN holds 1038 securities with 29.05% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 600 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.64%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
