CRBNvsNZACETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. CRBN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. CRBN is up 9.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$49M in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with 6.7% YTD performance, and -$457K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CRBN and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CRBN vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CRBN NZAC | +1.19%+0.37% | +11.37%+10.13% | +9.64%+6.70% | +23.83%+20.22% | +73.67%+63.62% | +66.32%+56.25% |
| Flows | CRBN NZAC | +$26M- | +$37M+$8M | +$49M-$457K | -$75M-$572K | -$207M-$129M | -$49M+$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CRBN NZAC | +17.87%+15.62% | +13.40%+11.78% | +14.28%+12.59% | +15.97%+14.21% |
| Max drawdown | CRBN NZAC | -5.72%-5.52% | -10.24%-9.86% | -16.48%-15.87% | -26.92%-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | CRBN NZAC | 21d21d | 50d76d | 87d86d | 752d763d |
Trading data
CRBN | NZAC | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $252.34 | $45.50 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $251.08 | $45.38 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $252.34 | $45.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.50% | +0.27% |
| AuM | $1.14 B | $190.83 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned Index |
| N° of holdings | 885 | 616 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2014 | November 25, 2014 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CRBN
USA
62.12%
Other
37.88%
NZAC
USA
62.93%
Other
37.07%
Sectors
CRBN
Information Techn.
30.39%
Financials
17.02%
Communication Ser.
9.74%
Industrials
8.9%
Consumer Discreti.
8.42%
Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.13%
NZAC
Information Techn.
33.22%
Financials
14.77%
Communication Ser.
8.81%
Consumer Discreti.
8.77%
Industrials
8.43%
Health Care
7.9%
Other
18.09%
Advertisement
Diversification
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.92%
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CRBN
NVIDIA
4.95%
APPLE
4.17%
MICROSOFT-T
2.99%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.64%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.43%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.95%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.80%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.77%
META PLATFORMS
1.35%
TESLA
1.16%
JPMORGAN CHASE
0.93%
LILLY
0.77%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
0.74%
HALLIBURTON
0.64%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
0.64%
NZAC
NVIDIA
5.87%
APPLE
4.49%
MICROSOFT-T
3.30%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.69%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.65%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.11%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.92%
TWN SEMICONT MAN
1.72%
META PLATFORMS
1.49%
TESLA
1.48%
DIGITAL REALTY REIT
1.33%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.16%
EQUINIX INC COMMON STOCK REIT
1.06%
LILLY
0.96%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY
0.92%
Frequently asked questions about CRBN and NZAC
How have the CRBN and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, CRBN is up 9.64% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has returned 6.7%. That puts CRBN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CRBN or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the CRBN ETF saw +$49M in flows, compared to -$457K for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CRBN or NZAC?
Over the past year, CRBN had a volatility of 13.4%, while NZAC experienced 11.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: CRBN or NZAC?
As of June 12, 2026, CRBN holds $1.14 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $190.83 M.
What sectors do the CRBN and NZAC ETFs invest in?
CRBN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the CRBN ETF and NZAC ETF?
CRBN top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CRBN or NZAC?
CRBN holds 956 securities with 28.92% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 662 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.14%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
