CRBNvsNZACETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. CRBN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. CRBN is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with 6.16% YTD performance, and -$457K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CRBN and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CRBN vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CRBN NZAC | -0.85%-0.49% | +3.20%+1.79% | +8.91%+6.16% | +17.95%+14.66% | +65.64%+56.50% | +64.85%+54.94% |
| Flows | CRBN NZAC | +$12M- | +$38M- | +$61M-$457K | -$52M-$572K | -$187M-$129M | -$62M+$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CRBN NZAC | +15.07%+12.86% | +13.82%+12.07% | +14.40%+12.67% | +16.02%+14.25% |
| Max drawdown | CRBN NZAC | -4.72%-4.71% | -10.24%-9.86% | -16.48%-15.87% | -26.92%-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | CRBN NZAC | 55d55d | 50d76d | 87d86d | 752d763d |
Trading data
CRBN | NZAC | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $249.20 | $45.28 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $249.66 | $45.17 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $249.20 | $45.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.18% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $1.13 B | $189.85 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
CRBN | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 1062 | 615 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2014 | November 25, 2014 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CRBN
USA
62.11%
Other
37.89%
NZAC
USA
63.04%
Other
36.96%
Sectors
CRBN
Technology
37.81%
Finance
20.82%
Industrials
8.77%
Healthcare
8.01%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.71%
Other
16.88%
NZAC
Technology
40.93%
Finance
23.37%
Industrials
9.13%
Healthcare
8.83%
Other
17.74%
Diversification
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.37%
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CRBN
NVIDIA Corp.
4.52%
Apple, Inc.
4.20%
Microsoft Corp.
2.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.28%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.18%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.87%
Broadcom Inc.
1.67%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.48%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.31%
Tesla, Inc.
1.22%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.21%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.99%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.97%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.94%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.94%
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
5.73%
Apple, Inc.
4.66%
Microsoft Corp.
2.94%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.36%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.89%
Broadcom Inc.
1.85%
Tesla, Inc.
1.79%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.59%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.44%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.34%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.20%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.17%
Frequently asked questions about CRBN and NZAC
How have the CRBN and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, CRBN is up 8.91% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has returned 6.16%. That puts CRBN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CRBN or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the CRBN ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to -$457K for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CRBN or NZAC?
Over the past year, CRBN had a volatility of 13.82%, while NZAC experienced 12.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: CRBN or NZAC?
As of July 27, 2026, CRBN holds $1.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $189.85 M.
What sectors do the CRBN and NZAC ETFs invest in?
CRBN leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CRBN ETF and NZAC ETF?
CRBN top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CRBN or NZAC?
CRBN holds 1069 securities with 28.37% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 622 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.9%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
