CPLBvsCMFETF Comparison
VS
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB) belongs to the Intl Aggregate Bonds segment. iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. CPLB's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, CMF's top sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. CPLB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.46%, versus 0.08% for CMF. CPLB is down -0.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$208M in YTD flows. CMF performs worse with -0.95% YTD performance, and +$1.69B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CPLB and CMF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CPLB vs CMF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CPLB CMF | +1.35%+3.76% | -1.32%-1.09% | -0.83%-0.95% | -0.89%-0.53% | +21.03%+12.11% | +1.93%+1.88% |
| Flows | CPLB CMF | +$77M+$548M | +$133M+$877M | +$208M+$1.69B | +$211M+$2.02B | +$256M+$3.13B | +$489M+$3.71B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CPLB CMF | +4.08%+4.95% | +3.43%+3.19% | +4.68%+3.57% | +5.86%+3.60% |
| Max drawdown | CPLB CMF | -3.61%-5.53% | -4.30%-6.52% | -4.30%-6.52% | -18.55%-12.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | CPLB CMF | 63d75d | 240d240d | 240d240d | 1372d1346d |
Trading data
CPLB | CMF | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.29 | $55.57 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $20.32 | $55.63 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CPLB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCPLB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CPLB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.29 | $55.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.15% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $484.14 M | $5.35 B |
| E/R | 0.46% | 0.08% |
Characteristics
CPLB | CMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | New York Life Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index |
| N° of holdings | 662 | 903 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 29, 2021 | October 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CPLB
USA
47.85%
Other
52.15%
CMF
USA
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Sectors
CPLB
Sovereign
13.75%
Finance
11%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
67.8%
CMF
Municipal
59.23%
Other
40.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
CPLB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.14%
CMF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CPLB
USA, Notes 4.375% 31jul2033, USD (N-2033)
8.55%
US912810UX45
5.32%
US912810UW61
2.81%
USA, Notes 4.375% 31jul2031, USD (AB-2031)
2.28%
USA, Notes 4.125% 15jul2029, USD (AQ-2029)
2.09%
US91282CRF04
0.62%
US3132DWDC47
0.47%
US31418EB825
0.46%
USA, Notes 4.25% 31jul2028, USD (BE-2028)
0.44%
US3140XQFR34
0.39%
US3137G0VB27
0.37%
US749384AA14
0.36%
Coty, 4.75% 15jan2029, USD
0.35%
US20754XAG88
0.34%
Evergy Kansas Central, 5.25% 15mar2035, USD
0.31%
CMF
Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A)
0.60%
US79766DLC10
0.52%
US032556NJ70
0.49%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024)
0.47%
University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD
0.46%
California Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1may2045, USD
0.44%
US4636324Q95
0.44%
US79905CAB90
0.42%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2034, USD (2024A)
0.41%
US13077DUT70
0.40%
University of California, 5% 15may2036, USD (2025)
0.39%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.37%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.34%
US91412GSH91
0.32%
East AWP Joint Powers Authority, 3.125% 1sep2026, USD (2024A)
0.32%
Frequently asked questions about CPLB and CMF
How have the CPLB and CMF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, CPLB is down -0.83% year-to-date (YTD), while CMF has lost -0.95%. That puts CPLB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CPLB or CMF?
Year-to-date, the CPLB ETF saw +$208M in flows, compared to +$1.69B for CMF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CPLB or CMF?
Over the past year, CPLB had a volatility of 3.43%, while CMF experienced 3.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: CPLB or CMF?
As of October 27, 2026, CPLB holds $484.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while CMF manages $5.35 B.
What sectors do the CPLB and CMF ETFs invest in?
CPLB leans toward sectors like Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, CMF focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CPLB ETF and CMF ETF?
CPLB top holdings include USA, Notes 4.375% 31jul2033, USD (N-2033), US912810UX45 and US912810UW61. CMF holds in its top three: Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A), US79766DLC10 and US032556NJ70.
Which ETF is more diversified: CPLB or CMF?
CPLB holds 961 securities with 25.14% of its assets in the top 15. CMF has 1670 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.39%.
Latest news about CPLB & CMF
What's the Fund | NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLB)
October 30, 2025
CPLB
Which Types of Bond ETFs Are the Most Tax Efficient?
September 2, 2025
CMF
Advertisement
Advertisement
