Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

COWGvsQOWZETF Comparison

ETF 1
COWG

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+1.32%
VS
ETF 2
QOWZ

Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+1.32%

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Energy. In contrast, QOWZ's top sector exposures are Technology, Business Services and Healthcare. COWG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.39% for QOWZ. COWG is up 7.53% year-to-date (YTD) with -$382M in YTD flows. QOWZ performs worse with -2.18% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and QOWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

COWG vs QOWZ performance and flow charts

Performance

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Cumulative Flows

-20,000,000-15,000,000-10,000,000-5,000,0000Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
COWG
QOWZ
-5.82%+2.93%
+4.13%+5.94%
+7.53%-2.18%
+8.22%-3.68%
+68.73%n/a
n/an/a
Flows
COWG
QOWZ
-$21M-
-$75M-$2M
-$382M-$2M
-$271M-$3M
+$1.84B-
--
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
COWG
QOWZ
+20.93%+16.70%
+18.18%+15.77%
+20.06%n/a
n/an/a
Max drawdown
COWG
QOWZ
-8.07%-8.53%
-10.75%-17.83%
-23.66%n/a
n/an/a
Max drawdown duration
COWG
QOWZ
30d59d
208d275d
204dn/a
n/an/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
COWG
QOWZ
Last sale
7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
$37.90
$35.33
Previous close
07/30/2026
$37.83
$34.99
Consolidated volume
07/30/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
COWG
QOWZ
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COWG
QOWZ
Last price
$37.90
$35.33
1D performance
+0.19%
+0.97%
AuM$2.21 B$11.89 M
E/R0.49%0.39%
Characteristics
COWG
QOWZ
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderPACER ETFsInvesco
BenchmarkPacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders IndexNasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index
N° of holdings10050
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 21, 2022December 5, 2023
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

COWG
USA
98.58%
Other
1.42%
QOWZ
USA
98.36%
Other
1.64%

Sectors

COWG
Technology
58.59%
Healthcare
13.75%
Other
27.66%
QOWZ
Technology
52.17%
Business Services
12.42%
Healthcare
10.77%
Industrials
10.09%
Other
14.55%
Advertisement

Diversification

COWG

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

40.23%
QOWZ

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

51.82%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
COWG
Sandisk Corp.
5.64%
Western Digital Corp.
4.82%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
3.87%
Astera Labs, Inc.
3.77%
Lam Research Corp.
3.47%
KLA Corp.
2.52%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.18%
F5, Inc.
1.90%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
1.84%
Okta, Inc.
1.83%
Datadog, Inc.
1.82%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.74%
NetApp, Inc.
1.65%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.62%
Southern Copper Corp.
1.56%
QOWZ
NVIDIA Corp.
9.53%
Broadcom Inc.
6.33%
KLA Corp.
4.87%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.58%
Fortinet, Inc.
3.03%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2.80%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.67%
Salesforce, Inc.
2.66%
Republic Services, Inc.
2.52%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.37%
Adobe, Inc.
2.19%
Intuit, Inc.
2.15%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
2.11%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
2.05%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.96%
Frequently asked questions about COWG and QOWZ

How have the COWG and QOWZ ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 30, 2026, COWG is up 7.53% year-to-date (YTD), while QOWZ has lost -2.18%. That puts COWG better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or QOWZ?

Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$382M in flows, compared to -$2M for QOWZ.

Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or QOWZ?

Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 18.18%, while QOWZ experienced 15.77%.

Which ETF is bigger: COWG or QOWZ?

As of July 30, 2026, COWG holds $2.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while QOWZ manages $11.89 M.

What sectors do the COWG and QOWZ ETFs invest in?

COWG leans toward sectors like Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QOWZ focuses on Technology, Business Services and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and QOWZ ETF?

COWG top holdings include Sandisk Corp., Western Digital Corp. and Iridium Communications, Inc.. QOWZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and KLA Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or QOWZ?

COWG holds 100 securities with 40.23% of its assets in the top 15. QOWZ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.82%.

Advertisement
Latest news about COWG & QOWZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up