Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
COWGvsPDPETF Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Invesco DWA Momentum ETF (PDP) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Materials. In contrast, PDP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. COWG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.62% for PDP. COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. PDP performs better with 3.61% YTD performance, and -$39M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and PDP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
COWG vs PDP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG PDP | -2.72%-4.87% | -3.12%+3.67% | -3.77%+3.61% | +11.90%+24.54% | +76.49%+68.50% | n/a+39.95% |
| Flows | COWG PDP | -$120M-$23M | -$215M-$38M | -$209M-$39M | +$961M-$151M | +$2.03B-$308M | --$862M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG PDP | +18.31%+24.30% | +22.90%+23.82% | +19.59%+19.87% | n/a+21.66% |
| Max drawdown | COWG PDP | -7.54%-7.63% | -16.34%-15.20% | -23.66%-23.82% | n/a-33.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG PDP | 44d16d | 37d50d | 204d284d | n/a976d |
COWG | PDP | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.86 | $120.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.93 | $121.25 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
COWG | PDP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
COWG | PDP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.86 | $120.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $1.29 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.62% |
COWG | PDP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | March 1, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the COWG and PDP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while PDP has returned 3.61%. That puts PDP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or PDP?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to -$39M for PDP.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or PDP?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 22.9%, while PDP experienced 23.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or PDP?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while PDP manages $1.29 B.
What sectors do the COWG and PDP ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, PDP focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and PDP ETF?
COWG top holdings include US5128073062, NEWMONT CORP and MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC. PDP holds in its top three: COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, AMPHENOL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or PDP?
COWG holds 100 securities with 38.99% of its assets in the top 15. PDP has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.97%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
