Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
COWGvsIMCGETF Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Materials. In contrast, IMCG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. COWG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.06% for IMCG. COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. IMCG performs better with -0.58% YTD performance, and +$50M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and IMCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
COWG vs IMCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG IMCG | -2.72%-3.85% | -3.12%-1.28% | -3.77%-0.58% | +11.90%+14.75% | +76.49%+48.65% | n/a+28.82% |
| Flows | COWG IMCG | -$120M+$12M | -$215M+$54M | -$209M+$50M | +$961M+$432M | +$2.03B+$1.11B | -+$1.05B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG IMCG | +18.31%+16.85% | +22.90%+20.28% | +19.59%+17.04% | n/a+20.12% |
| Max drawdown | COWG IMCG | -7.54%-6.28% | -16.34%-14.57% | -23.66%-21.86% | n/a-35.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG IMCG | 44d15d | 37d43d | 204d206d | n/a1060d |
COWG | IMCG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.86 | $79.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.93 | $79.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
COWG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
COWG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.86 | $79.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $3.12 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.06% |
COWG | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 245 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the COWG and IMCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCG has lost -0.58%. That puts IMCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or IMCG?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to +$50M for IMCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or IMCG?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 22.9%, while IMCG experienced 20.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or IMCG?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while IMCG manages $3.12 B.
What sectors do the COWG and IMCG ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, IMCG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and IMCG ETF?
COWG top holdings include US5128073062, NEWMONT CORP and MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC. IMCG holds in its top three: SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and HOWMET AEROSPACE INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or IMCG?
COWG holds 100 securities with 38.99% of its assets in the top 15. IMCG has 269 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
