Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
COWGvsFLRGETF Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Materials. In contrast, FLRG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. COWG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for FLRG. COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. FLRG performs better with -1.85% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and FLRG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
COWG vs FLRG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG FLRG | -2.72%-2.33% | -3.12%-2.24% | -3.77%-1.85% | +11.90%+16.77% | +76.49%+65.58% | n/a+78.51% |
| Flows | COWG FLRG | -$120M-$2M | -$215M+$88K | -$209M-$2M | +$961M+$35M | +$2.03B+$195M | -+$208M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG FLRG | +18.31%+10.38% | +22.90%+15.86% | +19.59%+13.46% | n/a+15.26% |
| Max drawdown | COWG FLRG | -7.54%-4.27% | -16.34%-11.50% | -23.66%-16.74% | n/a-20.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG FLRG | 44d44d | 37d38d | 204d154d | n/a604d |
COWG | FLRG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.86 | $37.24 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.93 | $37.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.86 | $37.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $264.59 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 101 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | September 15, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the COWG and FLRG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while FLRG has lost -1.85%. That puts FLRG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or FLRG?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to -$2M for FLRG.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or FLRG?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 22.9%, while FLRG experienced 15.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or FLRG?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLRG manages $264.59 M.
What sectors do the COWG and FLRG ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, FLRG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and FLRG ETF?
COWG top holdings include US5128073062, NEWMONT CORP and MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC. FLRG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or FLRG?
COWG holds 100 securities with 38.99% of its assets in the top 15. FLRG has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.11%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
