COWGvsFLRGETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Energy. In contrast, FLRG's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. COWG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for FLRG. COWG is up 12.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$136M in YTD flows. FLRG performs worse with 11.05% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and FLRG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COWG vs FLRG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG FLRG | -0.02%-1.66% | +1.91%+2.96% | +12.71%+11.05% | +8.68%+11.42% | +82.03%+65.96% | n/a+79.71% |
| Flows | COWG FLRG | +$259M-$65K | +$213M-$2M | -$136M-$6M | -$135M-$6M | +$2.08B+$181M | -+$202M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG FLRG | +20.11%+8.98% | +18.78%+10.62% | +20.13%+13.54% | n/a+15.28% |
| Max drawdown | COWG FLRG | -8.07%-3.44% | -10.75%-7.10% | -23.66%-16.74% | n/a-20.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG FLRG | 43d33d | 208d76d | 204d154d | n/a604d |
Trading data
COWG | FLRG | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.43 | $41.71 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $39.39 | $41.87 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.43 | $41.71 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $2.56 B | $292.16 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
COWG | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | September 15, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COWG
USA
98.52%
Other
1.48%
FLRG
USA
95.39%
Other
4.61%
Sectors
COWG
Technology
56.98%
Healthcare
14.51%
Other
28.51%
FLRG
Technology
42.32%
Finance
15.01%
Healthcare
9.97%
Industrials
7.21%
Other
25.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
COWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.32%
FLRG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
42.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
COWG
Western Digital Corp.
4.53%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
4.25%
Sandisk Corp.
3.32%
Astera Labs, Inc.
3.03%
Lam Research Corp.
2.71%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.36%
Okta, Inc.
2.12%
Datadog, Inc.
2.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.03%
F5, Inc.
1.96%
NetApp, Inc.
1.95%
KLA Corp.
1.87%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.79%
Southern Copper Corp.
1.68%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.67%
FLRG
Apple, Inc.
7.39%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.02%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.12%
Microsoft Corp.
4.36%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.98%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.79%
Visa, Inc.
1.74%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.65%
Johnson & Johnson
1.64%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.45%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.42%
Argan, Inc.
1.29%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.19%
Frequently asked questions about COWG and FLRG
How have the COWG and FLRG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, COWG is up 12.71% year-to-date (YTD), while FLRG has returned 11.05%. That puts COWG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or FLRG?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$136M in flows, compared to -$6M for FLRG.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or FLRG?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 18.78%, while FLRG experienced 10.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or FLRG?
As of September 18, 2026, COWG holds $2.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLRG manages $292.16 M.
What sectors do the COWG and FLRG ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FLRG focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and FLRG ETF?
COWG top holdings include Western Digital Corp., Iridium Communications, Inc. and Sandisk Corp.. FLRG holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or FLRG?
COWG holds 100 securities with 37.32% of its assets in the top 15. FLRG has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.13%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COWG & FLRG
Advertisement
