COWGvsAMOMETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Energy. In contrast, AMOM's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Energy. COWG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.75% for AMOM. COWG is up 12.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$136M in YTD flows. AMOM performs better with 23.09% YTD performance, and -$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and AMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COWG vs AMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG AMOM | -0.02%+1.49% | +1.91%-4.83% | +12.71%+23.09% | +8.68%+24.83% | +82.03%+99.15% | n/a+70.92% |
| Flows | COWG AMOM | +$259M- | +$213M-$10M | -$136M-$7M | -$135M-$14M | +$2.08B-$6M | --$19M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG AMOM | +20.11%+35.30% | +18.78%+29.02% | +20.13%+26.27% | n/a+25.38% |
| Max drawdown | COWG AMOM | -8.07%-18.31% | -10.75%-18.31% | -23.66%-30.25% | n/a-39.47% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG AMOM | 43d88d | 208d88d | 204d253d | n/a843d |
Trading data
COWG | AMOM | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.43 | $59.91 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $39.39 | $59.17 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
AMOM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCOWG | AMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COWG | AMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.43 | $59.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | +1.24% |
| AuM | $2.56 B | $22.47 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
COWG | AMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Qraft AI ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | May 1, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COWG
USA
98.52%
Other
1.48%
AMOM
USA
96.24%
Other
3.76%
Sectors
COWG
Technology
56.98%
Healthcare
14.51%
Other
28.51%
AMOM
Technology
54.74%
Industrials
16.85%
Energy
12.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.12%
Other
7.59%
Advertisement
Diversification
COWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.32%
AMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
COWG
Western Digital Corp.
4.53%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
4.25%
Sandisk Corp.
3.32%
Astera Labs, Inc.
3.03%
Lam Research Corp.
2.71%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.36%
Okta, Inc.
2.12%
Datadog, Inc.
2.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.03%
F5, Inc.
1.96%
NetApp, Inc.
1.95%
KLA Corp.
1.87%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.79%
Southern Copper Corp.
1.68%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.67%
AMOM
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.36%
Caterpillar, Inc.
4.05%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
3.99%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.66%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
3.27%
Western Digital Corp.
3.16%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.94%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
2.92%
Valero Energy Corp.
2.88%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.87%
Intel Corp.
2.59%
Quanta Services, Inc.
2.53%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.44%
Frequently asked questions about COWG and AMOM
How have the COWG and AMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, COWG is up 12.71% year-to-date (YTD), while AMOM has returned 23.09%. That puts AMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or AMOM?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$136M in flows, compared to -$7M for AMOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or AMOM?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 18.78%, while AMOM experienced 29.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or AMOM?
As of September 18, 2026, COWG holds $2.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while AMOM manages $22.47 M.
What sectors do the COWG and AMOM ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, AMOM focuses on Technology, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and AMOM ETF?
COWG top holdings include Western Digital Corp., Iridium Communications, Inc. and Sandisk Corp.. AMOM holds in its top three: Cisco Systems, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc. and Caterpillar, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or AMOM?
COWG holds 100 securities with 37.32% of its assets in the top 15. AMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about COWG & AMOM
