Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
COWGvsABFLETF Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) is part of the US All Cap segment. COWG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Materials. In contrast, ABFL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. Both COWG and ABFL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%. COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209M in YTD flows. ABFL performs better with 0.13% YTD performance, and -$118M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COWG and ABFL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
COWG vs ABFL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COWG ABFL | -2.72%-2.11% | -3.12%-0.36% | -3.77%+0.13% | +11.90%+15.28% | +76.49%+57.33% | n/a+64.38% |
| Flows | COWG ABFL | -$120M-$132M | -$215M-$107M | -$209M-$118M | +$961M-$57M | +$2.03B+$312M | -+$307M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COWG ABFL | +18.31%+16.11% | +22.90%+19.74% | +19.59%+15.55% | n/a+17.07% |
| Max drawdown | COWG ABFL | -7.54%-4.10% | -16.34%-14.10% | -23.66%-20.04% | n/a-21.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | COWG ABFL | 44d30d | 37d37d | 204d133d | n/a701d |
COWG | ABFL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.86 | $71.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $33.93 | $71.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
COWG | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
COWG | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.86 | $71.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | -0.46% |
| AuM | $2.15 B | $651.72 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.49% |
COWG | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 94 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 21, 2022 | September 27, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the COWG and ABFL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG is down -3.77% year-to-date (YTD), while ABFL has returned 0.13%. That puts ABFL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COWG or ABFL?
Year-to-date, the COWG ETF saw -$209M in flows, compared to -$118M for ABFL.
Which ETF is more volatile: COWG or ABFL?
Over the past year, COWG had a volatility of 22.9%, while ABFL experienced 19.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: COWG or ABFL?
As of March 13, 2026, COWG holds $2.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while ABFL manages $651.72 M.
What sectors do the COWG and ABFL ETFs invest in?
COWG leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, ABFL focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the COWG ETF and ABFL ETF?
COWG top holdings include US5128073062, NEWMONT CORP and MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC. ABFL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and US5128073062.
Which ETF is more diversified: COWG or ABFL?
COWG holds 100 securities with 38.99% of its assets in the top 15. ABFL has 61 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.38%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
