COMBvsBCIETF Comparison
ETF 1
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.72%
VS
ETF 2
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.72%
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. COMB is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.26% for BCI. COMB is up 34.34% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. BCI performs better with 34.58% YTD performance, and +$1.02B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of COMB and BCI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
COMB vs BCI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | COMB BCI | -1.90%-1.88% | +11.00%+11.07% | +34.34%+34.58% | +40.62%+40.56% | +55.07%+55.09% | +62.69%+62.07% |
| Flows | COMB BCI | +$30K+$51M | +$16M+$741M | +$18M+$1.02B | +$27M+$1.19B | +$17M+$2.10B | -$67M+$2.37B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | COMB BCI | +13.57%+13.54% | +18.07%+18.16% | +14.46%+14.53% | +16.59%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | COMB BCI | -5.36%-5.32% | -14.39%-14.33% | -14.39%-14.33% | -26.13%-26.07% |
| Max drawdown duration | COMB BCI | 22d22d | 105d105d | 105d105d | 1320d1323d |
Trading data
COMB | BCI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.49 | $26.42 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $28.39 | $26.26 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
COMB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCOMB | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
COMB | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.49 | $26.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.35% | +0.61% |
| AuM | $161.65 M | $3.53 B |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
COMB | BCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | GraniteShares | abrdn |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg Commodity Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Commodities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 22, 2017 | March 30, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
COMB
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
COMB
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
COMB
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
COMB
Data will be available soon
BCI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about COMB and BCI
How have the COMB and BCI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, COMB is up 34.34% year-to-date (YTD), while BCI has returned 34.58%. That puts BCI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: COMB or BCI?
Year-to-date, the COMB ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to +$1.02B for BCI.
Which ETF is more volatile: COMB or BCI?
Over the past year, COMB had a volatility of 18.07%, while BCI experienced 18.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: COMB or BCI?
As of October 15, 2026, COMB holds $161.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while BCI manages $3.53 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about COMB & BCI
Advertisement
