CNRGvsPBWETF Comparison
VS
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. CNRG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. CNRG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.64% for PBW. CNRG is up 36.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. PBW performs better with 48.16% YTD performance, and -$225M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNRG and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CNRG vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNRG PBW | +18.62%+17.99% | +33.32%+42.79% | +36.60%+48.16% | +117.30%+151.07% | +54.10%+27.01% | +30.87%-40.48% |
| Flows | CNRG PBW | +$10M+$105M | +$13M-$72M | +$15M-$225M | +$18M-$23M | -$102M-$106M | -$70M-$345M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNRG PBW | +35.85%+39.11% | +36.28%+39.69% | +33.93%+40.19% | +33.98%+42.72% |
| Max drawdown | CNRG PBW | -7.92%-9.66% | -17.73%-21.15% | -48.70%-68.02% | -59.07%-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNRG PBW | 16d8d | 175d98d | 804d1025d | 1645d1668d |
Trading data
CNRG | PBW | |
Last sale 6/4/2026 at 5:17 PM | $121.55 | $45.52 |
| Previous close 06/03/2026 | $122.22 | $45.35 |
| Consolidated volume 06/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CNRG | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/4/2026 at 5:17 PM
Live
Closed
CNRG | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.55 | $45.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | +0.37% |
| AuM | $271.93 M | $641.90 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.64% |
Characteristics
CNRG | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Invesco |
| Benchmark | S&P Kensho Clean Power Index | WilderHill Clean Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 49 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 22, 2018 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CNRG
USA
91.71%
Other
8.29%
PBW
USA
85.01%
Canada
9.88%
Other
5.11%
Sectors
CNRG
Industrials
43.32%
Utilities
16.93%
Information Techn.
15.43%
Other
24.31%
PBW
Industrials
31.79%
Information Techn.
16.39%
Consumer Discreti.
9.32%
Materials
8.37%
Other
34.13%
Advertisement
Diversification
CNRG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.09%
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CNRG
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
6.97%
GENERAC HOLDINGS
3.88%
US36828A1016
3.74%
PLUG POWER
3.45%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
3.38%
CORNING
3.32%
US65290E1010
3.32%
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR
3.06%
BALLARD POWER SYSTEMS
3.05%
NEXTERA ENERGY
3.00%
US88031M1099
2.99%
ARCOSA INC
2.84%
APPLIED MATERIAL
2.73%
US15234Q2075
2.70%
AVISTA
2.66%
PBW
SIGMA LITHIUM CORPORATION
2.54%
NAVITAS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
2.53%
BLOOM ENERGY CORP
2.06%
US35952H7008
2.02%
CH1403212751
2.02%
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR
1.98%
IM00BLCY1J27
1.89%
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS
1.87%
POWELL INDUSTRIES
1.78%
US46211L1017
1.76%
CA53681J1030
1.69%
US91733P1075
1.68%
PLUG POWER
1.65%
EOS ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC ORD SHA
1.65%
ENOVIX CORPORATION
1.65%
Frequently asked questions about CNRG and PBW
How have the CNRG and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 3, 2026, CNRG is up 36.6% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 48.16%. That puts PBW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNRG or PBW?
Year-to-date, the CNRG ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to -$225M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNRG or PBW?
Over the past year, CNRG had a volatility of 36.28%, while PBW experienced 39.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNRG or PBW?
As of June 3, 2026, CNRG holds $271.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $641.90 M.
What sectors do the CNRG and PBW ETFs invest in?
CNRG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CNRG ETF and PBW ETF?
CNRG top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, GENERAC HOLDINGS and US36828A1016. PBW holds in its top three: SIGMA LITHIUM CORPORATION, NAVITAS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: CNRG or PBW?
CNRG holds 43 securities with 51.09% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.76%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CNRG & PBW
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
