CNQQvsKBAETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.07%
Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) belongs to the EM Awakening segment. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF (KBA) is part of the China Blended Cap segment. CNQQ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, KBA's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. CNQQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.79% for KBA. CNQQ is down -1.66% year-to-date (YTD) with +$35M in YTD flows. KBA performs better with 6.93% YTD performance, and -$93M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNQQ and KBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CNQQ vs KBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNQQ KBA | -2.41%+0.76% | -12.51%-2.54% | -1.66%+6.93% | n/a+16.15% | n/a+49.28% | n/a+4.28% |
| Flows | CNQQ KBA | --$2M | +$21M-$12M | +$35M-$93M | --$114M | --$259M | --$256M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNQQ KBA | +33.94%+25.21% | n/a+19.75% | n/a+19.21% | n/a+20.00% |
| Max drawdown | CNQQ KBA | -14.45%-8.43% | n/a-8.43% | n/a-19.76% | n/a-45.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | CNQQ KBA | 64d71d | n/a71d | n/a316d | n/a1604d |
Trading data
CNQQ | KBA | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 6:18 PM | $22.70 | $32.63 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $22.71 | $32.61 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CNQQ | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 6:18 PM
Live
Closed
CNQQ | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.70 | $32.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.05% |
| AuM | $46.06 M | $143.61 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.79% |
Characteristics
CNQQ | KBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Rayliant Asset Management | KraneShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index | MSCI China A 50 Connect Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2025 | March 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CNQQ
China
99.23%
Other
0.77%
KBA
China
99.61%
Other
0.39%
Sectors
CNQQ
Technology
56%
Industrials
14.04%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.48%
Other
19.47%
KBA
Technology
29.79%
Finance
18.68%
Industrials
18.27%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.41%
Other
15.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.33%
KBA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.98%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.81%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.64%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
6.00%
Meituan
3.47%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.44%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.64%
NetEase, Inc.
2.50%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.03%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.03%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.84%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.82%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.77%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.58%
KBA
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
9.01%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
6.92%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.41%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
4.94%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
3.75%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
3.48%
CMOC Group Ltd.
3.47%
Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd.
3.20%
BYD Co., Ltd.
3.17%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.97%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.92%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
2.86%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.69%
Wanhua Chemical Group Co., Ltd.
2.38%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
2.26%
Frequently asked questions about CNQQ and KBA
How have the CNQQ and KBA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, CNQQ is down -1.66% year-to-date (YTD), while KBA has returned 6.93%. That puts KBA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNQQ or KBA?
Year-to-date, the CNQQ ETF saw +$35M in flows, compared to -$93M for KBA.
Which ETF is bigger: CNQQ or KBA?
As of September 2, 2026, CNQQ holds $46.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while KBA manages $143.61 M.
What sectors do the CNQQ and KBA ETFs invest in?
CNQQ leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, KBA focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CNQQ ETF and KBA ETF?
CNQQ top holdings include Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.. KBA holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. and Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CNQQ or KBA?
CNQQ holds 100 securities with 55.33% of its assets in the top 15. KBA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.43%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CNQQ & KBA
Rising Dragon: Top ETFs to Capitalize on China's Surging Stock Market
October 4, 2024
KBA
Advertisement
Advertisement
