CNAVvsCOWGETF Comparison
VS
Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. CNAV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, COWG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Energy. CNAV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.31%, versus 0.49% for COWG. CNAV is up 27.6% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. COWG performs worse with 11.72% YTD performance, and -$387M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CNAV and COWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CNAV vs COWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNAV COWG | +0.64%-2.01% | -7.96%-0.45% | +27.60%+11.72% | +30.09%+9.16% | n/a+77.82% | n/an/a |
| Flows | CNAV COWG | +$2M+$8M | +$6M-$35M | +$7M-$387M | +$6M-$386M | -+$1.83B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CNAV COWG | +44.46%+20.79% | +34.11%+18.82% | n/a+20.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CNAV COWG | -25.80%-8.07% | -25.80%-10.75% | n/a-23.66% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CNAV COWG | 81d43d | 81d208d | n/a204d | n/an/a |
Trading data
CNAV | COWG | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.50 | $39.12 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $39.31 | $39.11 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CNAV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCNAV | COWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CNAV | COWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.50 | $39.12 |
| 1D performance | +0.47% | +0.03% |
| AuM | $51.20 M | $2.28 B |
| E/R | 1.31% | 0.49% |
Characteristics
CNAV | COWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Mohr Funds | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 32 | 100 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2024 | December 21, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CNAV
USA
87.1%
Other
12.9%
COWG
USA
98.52%
Other
1.48%
Sectors
CNAV
Technology
51.93%
Industrials
19.2%
Finance
7.6%
Other
21.26%
COWG
Technology
56.98%
Healthcare
14.51%
Other
28.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
CNAV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
54.7%
COWG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CNAV
Western Digital Corp.
6.20%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.63%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
4.33%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
3.79%
NetApp, Inc.
3.59%
Datadog, Inc.
3.51%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
3.41%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
3.29%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
3.28%
Arista Networks, Inc.
3.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.23%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.14%
Sandisk Corp.
3.05%
Humana, Inc.
3.04%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
2.94%
COWG
Western Digital Corp.
4.53%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
4.25%
Sandisk Corp.
3.32%
Astera Labs, Inc.
3.03%
Lam Research Corp.
2.71%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.36%
Okta, Inc.
2.12%
Datadog, Inc.
2.05%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.03%
F5, Inc.
1.96%
NetApp, Inc.
1.95%
KLA Corp.
1.87%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.79%
Southern Copper Corp.
1.68%
Analog Devices, Inc.
1.67%
Frequently asked questions about CNAV and COWG
How have the CNAV and COWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CNAV is up 27.6% year-to-date (YTD), while COWG has returned 11.72%. That puts CNAV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CNAV or COWG?
Year-to-date, the CNAV ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to -$387M for COWG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CNAV or COWG?
Over the past year, CNAV had a volatility of 34.11%, while COWG experienced 18.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: CNAV or COWG?
As of September 11, 2026, CNAV holds $51.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while COWG manages $2.28 B.
What sectors do the CNAV and COWG ETFs invest in?
CNAV leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, COWG focuses on Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CNAV ETF and COWG ETF?
CNAV top holdings include Western Digital Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. COWG holds in its top three: Western Digital Corp., Iridium Communications, Inc. and Sandisk Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CNAV or COWG?
CNAV holds 32 securities with 54.7% of its assets in the top 15. COWG has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CNAV & COWG
Advertisement
