CMFvsTAFLETF Comparison
VS
iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF (TAFL) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. CMF's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, TAFL's top sector exposures are Municipal. CMF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.08%, versus 0.28% for TAFL. CMF is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.69B in YTD flows. TAFL performs worse with -1.02% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CMF and TAFL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CMF vs TAFL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CMF TAFL | +3.74%+1.06% | -1.10%-2.20% | -0.97%-1.02% | -0.54%-1.06% | +12.09%n/a | +1.97%n/a |
| Flows | CMF TAFL | +$548M-$2M | +$877M+$1M | +$1.69B+$15M | +$2.02B+$29M | +$3.13B- | +$3.71B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CMF TAFL | +4.99%+6.84% | +3.20%+4.24% | +3.57%n/a | +3.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CMF TAFL | -5.53%-6.79% | -6.52%-7.70% | -6.52%n/a | -12.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CMF TAFL | 74d71d | 239d109d | 239dn/a | 1346dn/a |
Trading data
CMF | TAFL | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $55.63 | $24.03 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $55.57 | $24.04 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 28, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TAFL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCMF | TAFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CMF | TAFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.63 | $24.03 |
| 1D performance | +0.11% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $5.35 B | $59.90 M |
| E/R | 0.08% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
CMF | TAFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | AllianceBernstein |
| Benchmark | ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 903 | 66 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 4, 2007 | December 13, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CMF
USA
59.23%
Other
40.77%
TAFL
USA
58.25%
Other
41.75%
Sectors
CMF
Municipal
59.23%
Other
40.77%
TAFL
Municipal
58.25%
Other
41.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
CMF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.39%
TAFL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CMF
Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A)
0.60%
US79766DLC10
0.52%
US032556NJ70
0.49%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2031, USD (2024)
0.47%
University of California, 5.5% 15may2040, USD
0.46%
California Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1may2045, USD
0.44%
US4636324Q95
0.44%
US79905CAB90
0.42%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2034, USD (2024A)
0.41%
US13077DUT70
0.40%
University of California, 5% 15may2036, USD (2025)
0.39%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.37%
California, 5.25% 1aug2032, USD
0.34%
US91412GSH91
0.32%
East AWP Joint Powers Authority, 3.125% 1sep2026, USD (2024A)
0.32%
TAFL
US896035DE92
2.72%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 31dec2065, USD (2025)
2.34%
Chicago, 5.25% 1nov2061, USD (2026A)
2.26%
West Linn-Wilsonville School District №3JT, 5% 15jun2046, USD (2026B)
1.93%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 15mar2055, USD (2025C)
1.80%
South Carolina Public Service Authority, 5.25% 1dec2054, USD (2024)
1.77%
US494791UA28
1.60%
US13048V7N23
1.60%
US544525X784
1.59%
US59333P7M43
1.58%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024D)
1.58%
Cuyahoga, 5.5% 1dec2061, USD (2026)
1.56%
US544446BT39
1.56%
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, 5.25% 1jan2040, USD (2025A)
1.56%
US79574CFC29
1.56%
Frequently asked questions about CMF and TAFL
How have the CMF and TAFL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, CMF is down -0.97% year-to-date (YTD), while TAFL has lost -1.02%. That puts CMF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CMF or TAFL?
Year-to-date, the CMF ETF saw +$1.69B in flows, compared to +$15M for TAFL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CMF or TAFL?
Over the past year, CMF had a volatility of 3.2%, while TAFL experienced 4.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: CMF or TAFL?
As of October 26, 2026, CMF holds $5.35 B in assets under management (AUM), while TAFL manages $59.90 M.
What sectors do the CMF and TAFL ETFs invest in?
CMF leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, TAFL focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CMF ETF and TAFL ETF?
CMF top holdings include Orange Water District, FRN 1aug2042, USD (2003A), US79766DLC10 and US032556NJ70. TAFL holds in its top three: US896035DE92, Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 31dec2065, USD (2025) and Chicago, 5.25% 1nov2061, USD (2026A).
Which ETF is more diversified: CMF or TAFL?
CMF holds 1670 securities with 6.39% of its assets in the top 15. TAFL has 127 securities and a top 15 weight of 27%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CMF & TAFL
Advertisement
