CMDYvsFTGCETF Comparison
ETF 1
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.19%
VS
ETF 2
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Commodity
+0.19%
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund ETF (FTGC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Commodity. CMDY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.98% for FTGC. CMDY is up 29.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$345M in YTD flows. FTGC performs better with 33.59% YTD performance, and +$942M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CMDY and FTGC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CMDY vs FTGC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CMDY FTGC | -0.54%-0.59% | +7.32%+4.95% | +29.68%+33.59% | +33.28%+36.29% | +52.18%+57.00% | +58.76%+80.32% |
| Flows | CMDY FTGC | +$32M+$80M | +$141M+$237M | +$345M+$942M | +$368M+$862M | +$360M+$153M | +$488M+$1.08B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CMDY FTGC | +11.12%+10.18% | +16.91%+15.58% | +13.70%+13.56% | +15.44%+15.02% |
| Max drawdown | CMDY FTGC | -4.21%-3.96% | -13.63%-12.01% | -13.63%-12.01% | -26.34%-20.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | CMDY FTGC | 50d49d | 111d98d | 111d98d | 1322d1324d |
Trading data
CMDY | FTGC | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 6:53 PM | $61.85 | $29.59 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $63.10 | $30.12 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTGC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCMDY | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 6:53 PM
Live
Closed
CMDY | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $61.85 | $29.59 |
| 1D performance | -1.98% | -1.76% |
| AuM | $742.73 M | $3.37 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.98% |
Characteristics
CMDY | FTGC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Commodities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 4, 2018 | October 23, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CMDY
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CMDY
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CMDY
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CMDY
Data will be available soon
FTGC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CMDY and FTGC
How have the CMDY and FTGC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, CMDY is up 29.68% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGC has returned 33.59%. That puts FTGC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CMDY or FTGC?
Year-to-date, the CMDY ETF saw +$345M in flows, compared to +$942M for FTGC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CMDY or FTGC?
Over the past year, CMDY had a volatility of 16.91%, while FTGC experienced 15.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: CMDY or FTGC?
As of October 30, 2026, CMDY holds $742.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTGC manages $3.37 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
