CLSMvsGALETF Comparison
VS
Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and State Street SPDR Global Allocation ETF (GAL) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Moderate. In contrast, GAL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. CLSM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.93%, versus 0.35% for GAL. CLSM is up 18.33% year-to-date (YTD) with -$24M in YTD flows. GAL performs worse with 7.73% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLSM and GAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CLSM vs GAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSM GAL | -0.90%-0.40% | +4.44%+0.57% | +18.33%+7.73% | +16.77%+7.47% | +47.25%+52.73% | +11.51%+31.10% |
| Flows | CLSM GAL | -+$3M | -$1M+$15M | -$24M+$27M | -$31M+$34M | -$44M+$17M | -$179M-$255K |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLSM GAL | +13.17%+7.47% | +15.06%+9.30% | +13.42%+9.45% | +12.81%+10.53% |
| Max drawdown | CLSM GAL | -3.81%-2.70% | -8.52%-6.29% | -14.57%-9.12% | -30.38%-21.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLSM GAL | 20d49d | 47d48d | 229d81d | 1590d918d |
Trading data
CLSM | GAL | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.68 | $52.61 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $27.48 | $52.41 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CLSM | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.68 | $52.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.73% | +0.37% |
| AuM | $97.13 M | $317.54 M |
| E/R | 0.93% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
CLSM | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Cabana ETF | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2021 | April 25, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CLSM
Data will be available soon
GAL
USA
32.25%
Other
67.75%
Sectors
CLSM
Data will be available soon
GAL
Technology
15.95%
Finance
11.15%
Industrials
7.1%
Other
65.8%
Advertisement
Diversification
CLSM
Data will be available soon
GAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
97.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CLSM
Data will be available soon
GAL
US78462F1030
26.78%
US78464A6495
18.32%
US78463X8891
14.07%
US78463X5095
9.06%
US78464A6644
3.96%
US78468R4406
3.75%
US78463X8719
3.07%
US78464A1512
2.94%
US78468R5155
2.88%
US78464A3674
2.86%
US78467V6083
2.49%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.16%
US78467Y1073
1.95%
Apple, Inc.
1.88%
Microsoft Corp.
1.52%
Frequently asked questions about CLSM and GAL
How have the CLSM and GAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, CLSM is up 18.33% year-to-date (YTD), while GAL has returned 7.73%. That puts CLSM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSM or GAL?
Year-to-date, the CLSM ETF saw -$24M in flows, compared to +$27M for GAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLSM or GAL?
Over the past year, CLSM had a volatility of 15.06%, while GAL experienced 9.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLSM or GAL?
As of October 26, 2026, CLSM holds $97.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while GAL manages $317.54 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
