CLSEvsHYGHETF Comparison
VS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CLSE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.52%, versus 1.12% for HYGH. CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$670M in YTD flows. HYGH performs worse with 3.08% YTD performance, and +$212M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLSE and HYGH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CLSE vs HYGH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSE HYGH | -1.55%-1.44% | -1.87%-0.33% | +22.03%+3.08% | +29.00%+4.78% | +111.52%+29.00% | n/a+37.68% |
| Flows | CLSE HYGH | +$66M-$4M | +$251M+$69M | +$670M+$212M | +$701M+$220M | +$858M+$476M | -+$521M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLSE HYGH | +9.17%+2.43% | +13.05%+2.96% | +13.48%+4.36% | n/a+6.58% |
| Max drawdown | CLSE HYGH | -3.35%-1.73% | -4.60%-1.73% | -15.76%-5.55% | n/a-8.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLSE HYGH | 10d32d | 40d32d | 188d78d | n/a252d |
Trading data
CLSE | HYGH | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.37 | $84.68 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $33.40 | $84.66 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CLSE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCLSE | HYGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CLSE | HYGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.37 | $84.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $639.39 M |
| E/R | 1.52% | 1.12% |
Characteristics
CLSE | HYGH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Convergence Investment Partners LLC | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | May 24, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HYGH
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HYGH
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HYGH
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HYGH
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CLSE and HYGH
How have the CLSE and HYGH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD), while HYGH has returned 3.08%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSE or HYGH?
Year-to-date, the CLSE ETF saw +$670M in flows, compared to +$212M for HYGH.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLSE or HYGH?
Over the past year, CLSE had a volatility of 13.05%, while HYGH experienced 2.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLSE or HYGH?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while HYGH manages $639.39 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
