CLSEvsHCMTETF Comparison
VS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) and Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US ETF (HCMT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. CLSE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.52%, versus 1.18% for HCMT. CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$670M in YTD flows. HCMT performs worse with 4.29% YTD performance, and -$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLSE and HCMT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CLSE vs HCMT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSE HCMT | -1.55%-6.78% | -1.87%+3.28% | +22.03%+4.29% | +29.00%+5.02% | +111.52%+79.34% | n/an/a |
| Flows | CLSE HCMT | +$66M+$1M | +$251M-$10M | +$670M-$21M | +$701M-$24M | +$858M+$231M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLSE HCMT | +9.17%+29.38% | +13.05%+28.78% | +13.48%+29.49% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CLSE HCMT | -3.35%-10.26% | -4.60%-15.61% | -15.76%-36.18% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CLSE HCMT | 10d17d | 40d108d | 188d246d | n/an/a |
Trading data
CLSE | HCMT | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.37 | $40.01 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $33.40 | $40.15 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CLSE | HCMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.37 | $40.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.34% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $580.42 M |
| E/R | 1.52% | 1.18% |
Characteristics
CLSE | HCMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Convergence Investment Partners LLC | Direxion |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | June 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HCMT
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HCMT
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HCMT
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CLSE
Data will be available soon
HCMT
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CLSE and HCMT
How have the CLSE and HCMT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE is up 22.03% year-to-date (YTD), while HCMT has returned 4.29%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLSE or HCMT?
Year-to-date, the CLSE ETF saw +$670M in flows, compared to -$21M for HCMT.
Which ETF is more volatile: CLSE or HCMT?
Over the past year, CLSE had a volatility of 13.05%, while HCMT experienced 28.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: CLSE or HCMT?
As of October 23, 2026, CLSE holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while HCMT manages $580.42 M.
Advertisement
Latest news about CLSE & HCMT
Advertisement
