Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CLCVvsPWVETF Comparison
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. CLCV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, PWV's top sector exposures are Financials, Energy and Health Care. CLCV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.55% for PWV. CLCV is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. PWV performs better with 3.28% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLCV and PWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLCV vs PWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLCV PWV | -3.67%-1.38% | -0.87%+2.77% | -0.30%+3.28% | n/a+21.28% | n/a+65.94% | n/a+79.99% |
| Flows | CLCV PWV | +$269K+$10M | +$2M+$24M | +$2M+$13M | -+$136M | -+$164M | -+$207M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLCV PWV | +12.68%+9.70% | n/a+15.51% | n/a+13.22% | n/a+14.38% |
| Max drawdown | CLCV PWV | -5.05%-3.64% | n/a-12.97% | n/a-14.40% | n/a-16.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLCV PWV | 30d10d | n/a49d | n/a192d | n/a688d |
CLCV | PWV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.27 | $68.70 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.24 | $68.70 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CLCV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CLCV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.27 | $68.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $13.52 M | $1.33 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.55% |
CLCV | PWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Crossmark Global Investment | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | March 3, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CLCV and PWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CLCV is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PWV has returned 3.28%. That puts PWV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLCV or PWV?
Year-to-date, the CLCV ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$13M for PWV.
Which ETF is bigger: CLCV or PWV?
As of March 11, 2026, CLCV holds $13.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while PWV manages $1.33 B.
What sectors do the CLCV and PWV ETFs invest in?
CLCV leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, PWV focuses on Financials, Energy and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the CLCV ETF and PWV ETF?
CLCV top holdings include EXXON, BK OF AMERICA CO and CISCO-T. PWV holds in its top three: EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and IE000S9YS762.
Which ETF is more diversified: CLCV or PWV?
CLCV holds 51 securities with 41.44% of its assets in the top 15. PWV has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.84%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
