Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CLCVvsMGVETF Comparison
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. CLCV's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. In contrast, MGV's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. CLCV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.05% for MGV. CLCV is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. MGV performs better with 3.68% YTD performance, and +$199M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLCV and MGV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLCV vs MGV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLCV MGV | -3.67%-4.12% | -0.87%+3.17% | -0.30%+3.68% | n/a+19.04% | n/a+60.74% | n/a+73.40% |
| Flows | CLCV MGV | +$269K+$73M | +$2M+$225M | +$2M+$199M | -+$1.26B | -+$2.42B | -+$4.05B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLCV MGV | +12.68%+10.66% | n/a+14.54% | n/a+12.06% | n/a+13.68% |
| Max drawdown | CLCV MGV | -5.05%-4.71% | n/a-11.06% | n/a-13.12% | n/a-16.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLCV MGV | 30d30d | n/a79d | n/a131d | n/a455d |
CLCV | MGV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.27 | $146.36 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.24 | $146.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CLCV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CLCV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.27 | $146.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | +0.23% |
| AuM | $13.52 M | $11.32 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.05% |
CLCV | MGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Crossmark Global Investment | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Mega Cap Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 51 | 118 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | December 17, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CLCV and MGV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CLCV is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD), while MGV has returned 3.68%. That puts MGV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLCV or MGV?
Year-to-date, the CLCV ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$199M for MGV.
Which ETF is bigger: CLCV or MGV?
As of March 11, 2026, CLCV holds $13.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGV manages $11.32 B.
What sectors do the CLCV and MGV ETFs invest in?
CLCV leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, MGV focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CLCV ETF and MGV ETF?
CLCV top holdings include EXXON, BK OF AMERICA CO and CISCO-T. MGV holds in its top three: JPMORGAN CHASE, BERKSHIRE HATHWAY and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: CLCV or MGV?
CLCV holds 51 securities with 41.44% of its assets in the top 15. MGV has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.31%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
