CLCGvsLGDSETF Comparison
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Growth ETF (LGDS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. CLCG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, LGDS's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. CLCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.4% for LGDS. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLCG and LGDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLCG vs LGDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLCG LGDS | -0.75%-1.37% | +1.74%n/a | +6.56%n/a | +10.14%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CLCG LGDS | --$21M | +$861K- | +$4M- | +$16M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLCG LGDS | +18.01%n/a | +17.86%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CLCG LGDS | -6.99%n/a | -16.42%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CLCG LGDS | 31dn/a | 188dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CLCG | LGDS | |
Last sale 9/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.52 | $48.79 |
| Previous close 09/09/2026 | $28.74 | $49.23 |
| Consolidated volume 09/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CLCG | LGDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.52 | $48.79 |
| 1D performance | -0.78% | -0.89% |
| AuM | $29.03 M | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.4% |
CLCG | LGDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Crossmark Global Investment | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 99 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | July 10, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
