Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CLCGvsIWYETF Comparison
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF (CLCG) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. CLCG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, IWY's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CLCG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.2% for IWY. CLCG is down -4.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. IWY performs worse with -4.79% YTD performance, and +$137M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CLCG and IWY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CLCG vs IWY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLCG IWY | -2.10%-1.35% | -5.90%-5.63% | -4.75%-4.79% | n/a+24.82% | n/a+110.54% | n/a+103.14% |
| Flows | CLCG IWY | +$1M+$26M | +$3M-$373M | +$2M+$137M | -+$658M | -+$3.99B | -+$5.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CLCG IWY | +17.64%+15.73% | n/a+22.35% | n/a+19.23% | n/a+21.50% |
| Max drawdown | CLCG IWY | -7.76%-7.20% | n/a-15.39% | n/a-23.25% | n/a-32.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CLCG IWY | 72d73d | n/a45d | n/a192d | n/a715d |
CLCG | IWY | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.65 | $263.56 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $25.68 | $263.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CLCG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CLCG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.65 | $263.56 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $23.63 M | $15.55 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.2% |
CLCG | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Crossmark Global Investment | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Top 200 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 27 | 105 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | September 22, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CLCG and IWY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CLCG is down -4.75% year-to-date (YTD), while IWY has lost -4.79%. That puts CLCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CLCG or IWY?
Year-to-date, the CLCG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$137M for IWY.
Which ETF is bigger: CLCG or IWY?
As of March 10, 2026, CLCG holds $23.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWY manages $15.55 B.
What sectors do the CLCG and IWY ETFs invest in?
CLCG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, IWY focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CLCG ETF and IWY ETF?
CLCG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. IWY holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CLCG or IWY?
CLCG holds 27 securities with 76.99% of its assets in the top 15. IWY has 111 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.69%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
