Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CIBRvsTRFKETF Comparison
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) belongs to the Cybersecurity segment. Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) is part of the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology and Industrials. CIBR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.49% for TRFK. CIBR is down -7.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$34M in YTD flows. TRFK performs better with 0.99% YTD performance, and +$66M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CIBR and TRFK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CIBR vs TRFK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIBR TRFK | -2.68%-2.22% | -12.85%-4.27% | -7.90%+0.99% | +3.51%+43.48% | +66.76%+168.65% | +56.30%n/a |
| Flows | CIBR TRFK | -$189M+$11M | +$11M+$76M | +$34M+$66M | +$2.08B+$383M | +$2.70B+$436M | +$4.49B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CIBR TRFK | +24.96%+28.11% | +24.28%+30.75% | +20.92%+27.17% | +24.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CIBR TRFK | -18.79%-9.81% | -21.31%-19.23% | -21.31%-28.62% | -33.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CIBR TRFK | 90d90d | 154d45d | 154d115d | 795dn/a |
CIBR | TRFK | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.30 | $63.34 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $65.76 | $64.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CIBR | TRFK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CIBR | TRFK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.30 | $63.34 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -2.06% |
| AuM | $9.89 B | $452.19 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.49% |
CIBR | TRFK | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index |
| N° of holdings | 31 | 75 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2015 | June 9, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CIBR and TRFK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CIBR is down -7.9% year-to-date (YTD), while TRFK has returned 0.99%. That puts TRFK better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CIBR or TRFK?
Year-to-date, the CIBR ETF saw +$34M in flows, compared to +$66M for TRFK.
Which ETF is more volatile: CIBR or TRFK?
Over the past year, CIBR had a volatility of 24.28%, while TRFK experienced 30.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: CIBR or TRFK?
As of March 11, 2026, CIBR holds $9.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while TRFK manages $452.19 M.
What sectors do the CIBR and TRFK ETFs invest in?
CIBR leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, TRFK focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CIBR ETF and TRFK ETF?
CIBR top holdings include CISCO-T, US4567881085 and PALO ALTO NETWORKS. TRFK holds in its top three: NVIDIA, BROADCOM LIMITED and ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIBR or TRFK?
CIBR holds 32 securities with 80.3% of its assets in the top 15. TRFK has 82 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
