CGWvsTBLUETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Tortoise Global Water ETF (TBLU) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, TBLU's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.4% for TBLU. CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. TBLU performs worse with 1.7% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and TBLU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs TBLU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW TBLU | -0.63%-0.92% | +1.88%-1.39% | +3.81%+1.70% | +5.49%-0.14% | +34.27%+28.80% | +23.01%+20.35% |
| Flows | CGW TBLU | +$5M+$2M | +$15M+$3M | +$41M+$3M | +$26M+$3M | -$156M-$4M | -$134M+$4M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW TBLU | +14.52%+14.16% | +13.31%+13.61% | +13.78%+13.98% | +15.73%+15.92% |
| Max drawdown | CGW TBLU | -5.68%-6.89% | -10.52%-12.75% | -14.42%-14.71% | -32.65%-34.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW TBLU | 50d78d | 158d151d | 227d134d | 862d867d |
Trading data
CGW | TBLU | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM | $65.27 | |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $64.97 | |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | TBLU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | TBLU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.27 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.46% | – |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $56.96 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
CGW | TBLU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Tortoise Capital |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | Tortoise Global Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 58 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | February 15, 2017 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
TBLU
USA
57.52%
United Kingdom
10.54%
Switzerland
9%
France
7.28%
Other
15.66%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
TBLU
Industrials
46.68%
Utilities
24.2%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.35%
Business Services
7.78%
Other
4.99%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
TBLU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.15%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
TBLU
Ecolab, Inc.
7.80%
Xylem, Inc.
7.68%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.42%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
7.30%
Veolia Environnement SA
7.28%
Veralto Corp.
4.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
4.07%
Geberit AG
4.01%
IDEX Corp.
3.99%
United Utilities Group Plc
3.72%
BELIMO Holding AG
3.65%
Severn Trent Plc
3.44%
Stantec, Inc.
2.63%
Pentair plc
2.09%
Kurita Water Industries Ltd.
1.98%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and TBLU
How have the CGW and TBLU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD), while TBLU has returned 1.7%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or TBLU?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$3M for TBLU.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or TBLU?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.31%, while TBLU experienced 13.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or TBLU?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while TBLU manages $56.96 M.
What sectors do the CGW and TBLU ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, TBLU focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and TBLU ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP. TBLU holds in its top three: Ecolab, Inc., Xylem, Inc. and American Water Works Co., Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or TBLU?
CGW holds 67 securities with 65.66% of its assets in the top 15. TBLU has 58 securities and a top 15 weight of 71.15%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & TBLU
Advertisement
