CGWvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.58% for REMX. CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. REMX performs worse with -31.52% YTD performance, and +$681M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW REMX | +3.82%-19.99% | -0.08%-25.11% | +3.73%-31.52% | +4.69%-23.25% | +47.09%-9.31% | +19.51%-50.86% |
| Flows | CGW REMX | -$358K-$17M | -$358K-$22M | +$41M+$681M | +$46M+$897M | -$126M+$1.64B | -$209M+$1.47B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW REMX | +12.89%+33.94% | +13.46%+40.68% | +13.63%+35.94% | +15.80%+35.67% |
| Max drawdown | CGW REMX | -7.04%-36.71% | -10.52%-53.39% | -14.42%-53.39% | -32.65%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW REMX | 89d70d | 249d180d | 227d180d | 862d1673d |
Trading data
CGW | REMX | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $65.28 | $49.82 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $64.06 | $50.26 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.28 | $49.82 |
| 1D performance | +1.90% | -0.88% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $1.44 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.58% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
55.93%
United Kingdom
14.3%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
19.34%
REMX
China
29.11%
Australia
25.56%
USA
21.71%
Chile
8.2%
Other
15.42%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
46.01%
Industrials
34.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.61%
Other
3.43%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
96.39%
Other
3.61%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.82%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.48%
Xylem, Inc.
7.04%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.84%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.83%
Severn Trent Plc
5.25%
Veralto Corp.
4.88%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.23%
Geberit AG
3.69%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.46%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.30%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.44%
American States Water Co.
2.24%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.10%
California Water Service Group
1.92%
REMX
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
8.20%
Albemarle Corp.
8.00%
MP Materials Corp.
6.36%
PLS Group Ltd.
6.09%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
5.96%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
5.86%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
5.09%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
4.73%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
4.54%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.21%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.68%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.63%
Liontown Ltd.
3.33%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.28%
Hubei Zhenhua Chemical Co. Ltd.
3.08%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and REMX
How have the CGW and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has lost -31.52%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or REMX?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$681M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or REMX?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.46%, while REMX experienced 40.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or REMX?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $1.44 B.
What sectors do the CGW and REMX ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and REMX ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP and Xylem, Inc.. REMX holds in its top three: Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Albemarle Corp. and MP Materials Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or REMX?
CGW holds 66 securities with 67.82% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.03%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & REMX
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
