Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGWvsREMXETF Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Materials, CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.58% for REMX. CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. REMX performs better with 31.47% YTD performance, and +$786M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGW vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW REMX | -6.90%+6.37% | +0.45%+32.65% | +1.28%+31.47% | +16.84%+139.90% | +41.22%+29.69% | +41.68%+36.47% |
| Flows | CGW REMX | +$5M+$183M | +$26M+$881M | +$26M+$786M | -$2M+$1.79B | -$196M+$1.71B | -$85M+$1.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW REMX | +11.88%+44.73% | +13.96%+39.35% | +13.42%+33.20% | +15.49%+34.83% |
| Max drawdown | CGW REMX | -7.31%-15.34% | -9.36%-24.86% | -15.88%-61.47% | -32.65%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW REMX | 15d30d | 35d112d | 140d908d | 862d1437d |
CGW | REMX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.54 | $89.51 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $63.85 | $93.81 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.54 | $89.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -4.58% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $2.96 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGW and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has returned 31.47%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or REMX?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$786M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or REMX?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.96%, while REMX experienced 39.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or REMX?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $2.96 B.
What sectors do the CGW and REMX ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and REMX ETF?
CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. REMX holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, RARE-EARTH and XIAMEN TUNGST.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or REMX?
CGW holds 62 securities with 68.4% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 24 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.5%.
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
