CGWvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.58% for REMX. CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. REMX performs worse with -8.56% YTD performance, and +$707M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW REMX | -0.63%-20.91% | +1.88%-34.34% | +3.81%-8.56% | +5.49%+36.07% | +34.27%-11.14% | +23.01%-29.17% |
| Flows | CGW REMX | +$5M-$95M | +$15M+$59M | +$41M+$707M | +$26M+$1.51B | -$156M+$1.65B | -$134M+$1.56B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW REMX | +14.52%+41.16% | +13.31%+42.46% | +13.78%+35.42% | +15.73%+35.69% |
| Max drawdown | CGW REMX | -5.68%-40.08% | -10.52%-40.08% | -14.42%-57.51% | -32.65%-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW REMX | 50d89d | 158d89d | 227d798d | 862d1582d |
Trading data
CGW | REMX | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 2:37 PM | $65.59 | $70.76 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $65.27 | $67.63 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 2:37 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.59 | $70.76 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | +4.63% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $1.95 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.58% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
REMX
China
35.01%
Australia
24.14%
USA
21.41%
Other
19.44%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
91.72%
Other
8.28%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
REMX
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
7.03%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
6.93%
Albemarle Corp.
6.91%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
PLS Group Ltd.
6.79%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
6.14%
MP Materials Corp.
6.02%
TW0007610B14
4.69%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.65%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
4.61%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
4.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.87%
Liontown Ltd.
3.78%
Sanxiang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd
3.32%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.31%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and REMX
How have the CGW and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has lost -8.56%. That puts CGW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or REMX?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$707M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or REMX?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.31%, while REMX experienced 42.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or REMX?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $1.95 B.
What sectors do the CGW and REMX ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and REMX ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP. REMX holds in its top three: Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd., China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. and Albemarle Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or REMX?
CGW holds 67 securities with 65.66% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.99%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
