CGWvsNANRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NANR
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.32%
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NANR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.35% for NANR. CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. NANR performs better with 18.81% YTD performance, and -$146M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and NANR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs NANR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW NANR | -0.63%+5.08% | +1.88%-2.06% | +3.81%+18.81% | +5.49%+42.84% | +34.27%+58.36% | +23.01%+123.29% |
| Flows | CGW NANR | +$5M+$14M | +$15M-$8M | +$41M-$146M | +$26M-$86M | -$156M-$99M | -$134M-$133M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW NANR | +14.52%+19.11% | +13.31%+18.85% | +13.78%+19.29% | +15.73%+22.24% |
| Max drawdown | CGW NANR | -5.68%-11.20% | -10.52%-12.16% | -14.42%-18.22% | -32.65%-26.26% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW NANR | 50d83d | 158d154d | 227d200d | 862d759d |
Trading data
CGW | NANR | |
Last sale 8/4/2026 at 2:37 PM | $65.59 | $80.23 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $65.27 | $80.00 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/4/2026 at 2:37 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.59 | $80.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | +0.29% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $755.30 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 211 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | December 15, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
NANR
USA
66.64%
Canada
25.72%
Other
7.63%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
NANR
Non-Energy Materi.
46.53%
Energy
42.64%
Other
10.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
NANR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.6%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
NANR
Exxon Mobil Corp.
9.75%
Chevron Corp.
6.23%
Corteva, Inc.
3.58%
Newmont Corp.
3.35%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.04%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.65%
ConocoPhillips
2.54%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.32%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.07%
Nutrien Ltd.
1.91%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.71%
Nucor Corp.
1.70%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.65%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.55%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
1.53%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and NANR
How have the CGW and NANR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD), while NANR has returned 18.81%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or NANR?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to -$146M for NANR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or NANR?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.31%, while NANR experienced 18.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or NANR?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while NANR manages $755.30 M.
What sectors do the CGW and NANR ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NANR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and NANR ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP. NANR holds in its top three: Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and Corteva, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or NANR?
CGW holds 67 securities with 65.66% of its assets in the top 15. NANR has 212 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.6%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & NANR
Advertisement
