CGWvsNANRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NANR
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.1%
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NANR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.35% for NANR. CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. NANR performs better with 27.61% YTD performance, and -$131M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and NANR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs NANR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW NANR | +3.82%+0.98% | -0.08%+7.41% | +3.73%+27.61% | +4.69%+39.15% | +47.09%+79.61% | +19.51%+121.38% |
| Flows | CGW NANR | -$358K+$11M | -$358K+$15M | +$41M-$131M | +$46M-$133M | -$126M-$79M | -$209M-$90M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW NANR | +12.89%+16.62% | +13.46%+19.14% | +13.63%+19.25% | +15.80%+22.02% |
| Max drawdown | CGW NANR | -7.04%-7.91% | -10.52%-12.16% | -14.42%-18.22% | -32.65%-26.26% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW NANR | 89d54d | 249d161d | 227d200d | 862d759d |
Trading data
CGW | NANR | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $65.28 | $84.57 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $64.06 | $85.86 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.28 | $84.57 |
| 1D performance | +1.90% | -1.50% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $826.27 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
CGW | NANR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 66 | 198 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | December 15, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
55.93%
United Kingdom
14.3%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
19.34%
NANR
USA
58.8%
Canada
27.26%
Other
13.95%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
46.01%
Industrials
34.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.61%
Other
3.43%
NANR
Non-Energy Materi.
48.34%
Energy
34.59%
Other
17.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.82%
NANR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
41.39%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.48%
Xylem, Inc.
7.04%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.84%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.83%
Severn Trent Plc
5.25%
Veralto Corp.
4.88%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.23%
Geberit AG
3.69%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.46%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.30%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.44%
American States Water Co.
2.24%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.10%
California Water Service Group
1.92%
NANR
Chevron Corp.
7.26%
Newmont Corp.
3.91%
Corteva, Inc.
3.29%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.24%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
3.00%
ConocoPhillips
2.70%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.43%
Barrick Mining Corp.
2.16%
Nutrien Ltd.
2.14%
Valero Energy Corp.
2.01%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.99%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.96%
Phillips 66
1.83%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.75%
Nucor Corp.
1.71%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and NANR
How have the CGW and NANR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while NANR has returned 27.61%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or NANR?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to -$131M for NANR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or NANR?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.46%, while NANR experienced 19.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or NANR?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while NANR manages $826.27 M.
What sectors do the CGW and NANR ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NANR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and NANR ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP and Xylem, Inc.. NANR holds in its top three: Chevron Corp., Newmont Corp. and Corteva, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or NANR?
CGW holds 66 securities with 67.82% of its assets in the top 15. NANR has 198 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.39%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & NANR
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
