CGWvsGNRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.1%
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.4% for GNR. CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 21.8% YTD performance, and +$755M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW GNR | +3.82%+0.73% | -0.08%+3.63% | +3.73%+21.80% | +4.69%+31.42% | +47.09%+52.30% | +19.51%+68.27% |
| Flows | CGW GNR | -$358K+$245M | -$358K+$426M | +$41M+$755M | +$46M+$540M | -$126M+$451M | -$209M+$1.91B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW GNR | +12.89%+12.70% | +13.46%+15.23% | +13.63%+14.96% | +15.80%+17.76% |
| Max drawdown | CGW GNR | -7.04%-7.65% | -10.52%-10.66% | -14.42%-19.80% | -32.65%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW GNR | 89d54d | 249d158d | 227d457d | 862d758d |
Trading data
CGW | GNR | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $65.28 | $73.76 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $64.06 | $74.69 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.28 | $73.76 |
| 1D performance | +1.90% | -1.25% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $5.36 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | S&P Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 66 | 89 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | September 13, 2010 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
55.93%
United Kingdom
14.3%
Brazil
10.44%
Other
19.34%
GNR
USA
28.58%
Canada
19.2%
United Kingdom
10.08%
Australia
7.55%
Other
34.58%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
46.01%
Industrials
34.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.61%
Other
3.43%
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
58.25%
Energy
30.87%
Other
10.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
67.82%
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.48%
Xylem, Inc.
7.04%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.84%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.83%
Severn Trent Plc
5.25%
Veralto Corp.
4.88%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.23%
Geberit AG
3.69%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.46%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.30%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.44%
American States Water Co.
2.24%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.10%
California Water Service Group
1.92%
GNR
Nutrien Ltd.
5.03%
Shell Plc
5.00%
BHP Group Ltd.
4.73%
TotalEnergies SE
3.39%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
3.23%
Newmont Corp.
2.89%
Chevron Corp.
2.71%
Corteva, Inc.
2.46%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.36%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.19%
BP Plc
2.16%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.85%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
1.81%
Glencore Plc
1.64%
Barrick Mining Corp.
1.61%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and GNR
How have the CGW and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW is up 3.73% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 21.8%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or GNR?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$755M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or GNR?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.46%, while GNR experienced 15.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or GNR?
As of November 2, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $5.36 B.
What sectors do the CGW and GNR ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and GNR ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP and Xylem, Inc.. GNR holds in its top three: Nutrien Ltd., Shell Plc and BHP Group Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or GNR?
CGW holds 66 securities with 67.82% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.07%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & GNR
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
CGW
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
