CGWvsGNRETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
GNR
State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0.32%
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.4% for GNR. CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 17.54% YTD performance, and +$329M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGW vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW GNR | -0.63%+6.11% | +1.88%-1.20% | +3.81%+17.54% | +5.49%+36.45% | +34.27%+42.75% | +23.01%+63.32% |
| Flows | CGW GNR | +$5M-$29M | +$15M+$61M | +$41M+$329M | +$26M+$512M | -$156M+$359M | -$134M+$1.60B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW GNR | +14.52%+14.94% | +13.31%+14.96% | +13.78%+15.08% | +15.73%+17.98% |
| Max drawdown | CGW GNR | -5.68%-10.55% | -10.52%-10.66% | -14.42%-19.80% | -32.65%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW GNR | 50d82d | 158d154d | 227d457d | 862d758d |
Trading data
CGW | GNR | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM | $65.27 | $72.18 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $64.97 | $72.04 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.27 | $72.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.46% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $1.06 B | $4.78 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Index | S&P Global Natural Resources Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 88 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 14, 2007 | September 13, 2010 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGW
USA
59.15%
United Kingdom
11.29%
Brazil
10.57%
Other
18.99%
GNR
USA
34.78%
Canada
18.26%
United Kingdom
8.8%
Australia
8.29%
Other
29.87%
Sectors
CGW
Utilities
43.48%
Industrials
36.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.18%
Other
3.78%
GNR
Non-Energy Materi.
60.3%
Energy
32.77%
Other
6.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.66%
GNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.9%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CGW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
7.85%
Xylem, Inc.
7.34%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.32%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.80%
Veralto Corp.
5.33%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.18%
United Utilities Group Plc
4.16%
Severn Trent Plc
3.95%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
3.53%
Geberit AG
3.38%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.15%
American States Water Co.
2.63%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
2.41%
California Water Service Group
2.40%
Core & Main, Inc.
2.22%
GNR
BHP Group Ltd.
5.37%
Nutrien Ltd.
4.82%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
4.48%
Shell Plc
4.15%
Corteva, Inc.
3.27%
TotalEnergies SE
2.96%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj
2.93%
Newmont Corp.
2.67%
Chevron Corp.
2.44%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
2.37%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
2.11%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.04%
BP Plc
1.83%
Reliance Industries Ltd.
1.76%
Glencore Plc
1.70%
Frequently asked questions about CGW and GNR
How have the CGW and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW is up 3.81% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 17.54%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or GNR?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$329M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or GNR?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.31%, while GNR experienced 14.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or GNR?
As of August 3, 2026, CGW holds $1.06 B in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.78 B.
What sectors do the CGW and GNR ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and GNR ETF?
CGW top holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Xylem, Inc. and Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP. GNR holds in its top three: BHP Group Ltd., Nutrien Ltd. and Exxon Mobil Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or GNR?
CGW holds 67 securities with 65.66% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 88 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.9%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGW & GNR
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
February 8, 2024
GNR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
CGW
Advertisement
Advertisement
