Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGWvsGNRETF Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, GNR's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Consumer Staples. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.4% for GNR. CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. GNR performs better with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$288M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and GNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGW vs GNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW GNR | -6.90%-0.35% | +0.45%+18.77% | +1.28%+16.68% | +16.84%+43.08% | +41.22%+45.26% | +41.68%+67.99% |
| Flows | CGW GNR | +$5M+$46M | +$26M+$365M | +$26M+$288M | -$2M+$826M | -$196M+$102M | -$85M+$1.83B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW GNR | +11.88%+19.19% | +13.96%+17.00% | +13.42%+15.75% | +15.49%+18.20% |
| Max drawdown | CGW GNR | -7.31%-4.57% | -9.36%-14.74% | -15.88%-19.80% | -32.65%-25.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW GNR | 15d11d | 35d82d | 140d457d | 862d758d |
CGW | GNR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.54 | $72.43 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $63.85 | $73.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGW | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.54 | $72.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -1.66% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $4.76 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGW and GNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while GNR has returned 16.68%. That puts GNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or GNR?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$288M for GNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or GNR?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.96%, while GNR experienced 17%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or GNR?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while GNR manages $4.76 B.
What sectors do the CGW and GNR ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, GNR focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and GNR ETF?
CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. GNR holds in its top three: NUTRIEN LTD, EXXON and BHP GROUP LTD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or GNR?
CGW holds 62 securities with 68.4% of its assets in the top 15. GNR has 89 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
3 Famous Investment Portfolios (And How to Make Them with ETFs)
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
