Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGWvsAQWAETF Comparison
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF (CGW) and Global X Clean Water ETF (AQWA) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CGW's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, AQWA's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. CGW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.5% for AQWA. CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$26M in YTD flows. AQWA performs better with 1.87% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGW and AQWA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGW vs AQWA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGW AQWA | -6.90%-7.56% | +0.45%+0.38% | +1.28%+1.87% | +16.84%+15.77% | +41.22%+42.57% | +41.68%n/a |
| Flows | CGW AQWA | +$5M-$5M | +$26M+$6M | +$26M+$7M | -$2M+$17M | -$196M+$17M | -$85M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGW AQWA | +11.88%+13.14% | +13.96%+14.37% | +13.42%+13.74% | +15.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CGW AQWA | -7.31%-8.04% | -9.36%-8.46% | -15.88%-14.57% | -32.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGW AQWA | 15d15d | 35d35d | 140d211d | 862dn/a |
CGW | AQWA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.54 | $19.10 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $63.85 | $19.11 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGW | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGW | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.54 | $19.10 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $1.02 B | $26.27 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.5% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGW and AQWA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW is up 1.28% year-to-date (YTD), while AQWA has returned 1.87%. That puts AQWA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGW or AQWA?
Year-to-date, the CGW ETF saw +$26M in flows, compared to +$7M for AQWA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGW or AQWA?
Over the past year, CGW had a volatility of 13.96%, while AQWA experienced 14.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGW or AQWA?
As of March 13, 2026, CGW holds $1.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while AQWA manages $26.27 M.
What sectors do the CGW and AQWA ETFs invest in?
CGW leans toward sectors like Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, AQWA focuses on Industrials and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the CGW ETF and AQWA ETF?
CGW top holdings include COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO, XYLEM and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. AQWA holds in its top three: US31488V1070, PENTAIR PLC and XYLEM.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGW or AQWA?
CGW holds 62 securities with 68.4% of its assets in the top 15. AQWA has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.19%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
