CGVVvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. CGVV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. CGVV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. CGVV is up 17.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$93M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 21.02% YTD performance, and +$238M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGVV and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGVV vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGVV FNDB | +1.77%+3.87% | +2.04%+3.08% | +17.28%+21.02% | +21.91%+24.75% | n/a+88.87% | n/a+84.07% |
| Flows | CGVV FNDB | +$12M+$3M | +$18M+$46M | +$93M+$238M | +$95M+$253M | -+$438M | -+$606M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGVV FNDB | +10.85%+7.83% | +13.51%+10.26% | n/a+13.27% | n/a+15.30% |
| Max drawdown | CGVV FNDB | -5.14%-3.80% | -10.13%-6.34% | n/a-16.85% | n/a-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGVV FNDB | 78d66d | 67d63d | n/a213d | n/a546d |
Trading data
CGVV | FNDB | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $31.63 | $31.78 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $31.46 | $31.78 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGVV
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCGVV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGVV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.63 | $31.78 |
| 1D performance | +0.54% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $160.40 M | $1.51 B |
| E/R | 0.33% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
CGVV | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 66 | 1408 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2025 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGVV
USA
96.22%
Other
3.78%
FNDB
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
Sectors
CGVV
Technology
25.06%
Industrials
16.88%
Finance
13.57%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.25%
Healthcare
7.65%
Other
26.59%
FNDB
Technology
24.07%
Finance
17.23%
Healthcare
12.44%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.52%
Energy
9.69%
Industrials
7.33%
Other
18.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGVV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.99%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.3%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CGVV
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.26%
Microsoft Corp.
6.50%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.72%
Intel Corp.
3.49%
Uber Technologies, Inc.
3.30%
Starbucks Corp.
2.94%
APi Group Corp.
2.91%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.14%
Comcast Corp.
2.08%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.02%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.01%
RTX Corp.
1.97%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.93%
PG&E Corp.
1.87%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.85%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
Microsoft Corp.
3.05%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.67%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.58%
Chevron Corp.
1.51%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.40%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.34%
Intel Corp.
1.20%
Johnson & Johnson
1.04%
Walmart, Inc.
0.96%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about CGVV and FNDB
How have the CGVV and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, CGVV is up 17.28% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 21.02%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGVV or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the CGVV ETF saw +$93M in flows, compared to +$238M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGVV or FNDB?
Over the past year, CGVV had a volatility of 13.51%, while FNDB experienced 10.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGVV or FNDB?
As of October 30, 2026, CGVV holds $160.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.51 B.
What sectors do the CGVV and FNDB ETFs invest in?
CGVV leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CGVV ETF and FNDB ETF?
CGVV top holdings include Amazon.com, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGVV or FNDB?
CGVV holds 66 securities with 46.99% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1410 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.3%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
