Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGUSvsGSUSETF Comparison
Capital Group Core Equity ETF (CGUS) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CGUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. In contrast, GSUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CGUS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. CGUS is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$773M in YTD flows. GSUS performs worse with -1.08% YTD performance, and -$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGUS and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGUS vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGUS GSUS | -2.02%-2.09% | -0.87%-1.69% | -0.25%-1.08% | +21.24%+22.50% | +83.81%+84.71% | n/a+83.90% |
| Flows | CGUS GSUS | +$348M-$543K | +$998M-$15M | +$773M-$10M | +$3.25B+$6M | +$6.65B+$1.10B | -+$1.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGUS GSUS | +12.40%+11.62% | +17.56%+18.34% | +14.17%+14.95% | n/a+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | CGUS GSUS | -3.68%-3.51% | -12.90%-13.91% | -18.10%-19.14% | n/a-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGUS GSUS | 43d57d | 45d45d | 139d126d | n/a715d |
CGUS | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.11 | $93.32 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $40.17 | $93.33 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGUS | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGUS | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.11 | $93.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.15% | -0.01% |
| AuM | $9.08 B | $2.94 B |
| E/R | 0.33% | 0.09% |
CGUS | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 65 | 400 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGUS and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CGUS is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.08%. That puts CGUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGUS or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the CGUS ETF saw +$773M in flows, compared to -$10M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGUS or GSUS?
Over the past year, CGUS had a volatility of 17.56%, while GSUS experienced 18.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGUS or GSUS?
As of March 11, 2026, CGUS holds $9.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.94 B.
What sectors do the CGUS and GSUS ETFs invest in?
CGUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CGUS ETF and GSUS ETF?
CGUS top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and BROADCOM LIMITED. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGUS or GSUS?
CGUS holds 68 securities with 52.68% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
