CGHMvsIBMPETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMP) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. CGHM's top 1 sector exposures are Municipal. In contrast, IBMP's top sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. CGHM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.1% for IBMP. CGHM is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.21B in YTD flows. IBMP performs better with 1.54% YTD performance, and +$92M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGHM and IBMP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGHM vs IBMP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGHM IBMP | -0.63%+0.10% | -3.99%+0.20% | -1.27%+1.54% | -0.65%+2.00% | n/a+10.92% | n/a+3.92% |
| Flows | CGHM IBMP | +$300M+$19M | +$501M+$46M | +$1.21B+$92M | +$1.42B+$123M | -+$393M | -+$628M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGHM IBMP | +5.57%+0.66% | +3.65%+0.50% | n/a+1.26% | n/a+1.94% |
| Max drawdown | CGHM IBMP | -6.27%-0.57% | -6.96%-0.57% | n/a-1.45% | n/a-9.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGHM IBMP | 92d46d | 110d46d | n/a195d | n/a1260d |
Trading data
CGHM | IBMP | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.42 | $25.26 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.43 | $25.24 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGHM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCGHM | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGHM | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.42 | $25.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.08% |
| AuM | $3.56 B | $688.23 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
CGHM | IBMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2027 Index |
| N° of holdings | 845 | 677 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 25, 2024 | August 9, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGHM
USA
45.11%
Other
54.89%
IBMP
USA
50.25%
Other
49.75%
Sectors
CGHM
Municipal
45.11%
Other
54.89%
IBMP
Municipal
49.71%
Other
50.29%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.41%
IBMP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CGHM
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
1.31%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD
0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.61%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
0.53%
US419800PW17
0.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2012A)
0.44%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 4% 1sep2046, USD (2026A)
0.43%
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 5% 1jul2047, USD (2020A)
0.42%
City of New York, FRN 1apr2042, USD
0.35%
Capital Trust Agency, 5% 1jul2056, USD (2021A-1)
0.34%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2036, USD (2026)
0.33%
US45203HAH57
0.33%
US83703FLR19
0.33%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1jun2034, USD (2026)
0.32%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1oct2040, USD (2020)
0.31%
IBMP
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
0.55%
Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016)
0.45%
California, 5% 1apr2027, USD
0.44%
US91412HTM50
0.39%
US80585TCQ22
0.37%
Geisinger Authority Health System, 5% 1apr2043, USD (2021A)
0.36%
US09182NCB47
0.34%
El Camino Community College District, 0% 1aug2027, USD (2012C)
0.32%
US100853UQ10
0.32%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2027, USD
0.32%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2027, USD (2011A)
0.32%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017A)
0.31%
District of Columbia, 5% 1oct2027, USD (2019C)
0.29%
Illinois, 5% 1nov2027, USD (2017D)
0.28%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2027, USD (2021C-2)
0.28%
Frequently asked questions about CGHM and IBMP
How have the CGHM and IBMP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CGHM is down -1.27% year-to-date (YTD), while IBMP has returned 1.54%. That puts IBMP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGHM or IBMP?
Year-to-date, the CGHM ETF saw +$1.21B in flows, compared to +$92M for IBMP.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGHM or IBMP?
Over the past year, CGHM had a volatility of 3.65%, while IBMP experienced 0.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGHM or IBMP?
As of October 16, 2026, CGHM holds $3.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while IBMP manages $688.23 M.
What sectors do the CGHM and IBMP ETFs invest in?
CGHM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, IBMP focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CGHM ETF and IBMP ETF?
CGHM top holdings include Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD, Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD and Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD. IBMP holds in its top three: BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, Michigan, 5% 15mar2027, USD (2016) and California, 5% 1apr2027, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGHM or IBMP?
CGHM holds 2608 securities with 7.41% of its assets in the top 15. IBMP has 1831 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.33%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
